Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34619989›Full record

ArticleBone & joint open2021

Pilot study of micromotion nailing for mechanical stimulation of tibial fracture healing.

Hannah L Dailey, Peter Schwarzenberg, Edmund B Webb Iii, Sinead A M Boran, Shane Guerin, James A Harty

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bone & joint open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Mechanically compliant locking plates for diaphyseal fracture fixation: A biomechanical study.Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society · 2025
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Hannah L DaileyDepartment of Mechanical Engineering & Mechanics, Lehigh University, Bethlehem, Pennsylvania, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4574-800X
Peter SchwarzenbergDepartment of Mechanical Engineering & Mechanics, Lehigh University, Bethlehem, Pennsylvania, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8747-6786
Edmund B Webb IiiDepartment of Mechanical Engineering & Mechanics, Lehigh University, Bethlehem, Pennsylvania, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7386-3945
Sinead A M BoranDepartment of Orthopaedics, Cork University Hospital, Wilton, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0001-8619-9791
Shane GuerinDepartment of Orthopaedics, Cork University Hospital, Wilton, Ireland.
James A HartyDepartment of Orthopaedics, Cork University Hospital, Wilton, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0001-8437-4357

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsThe study objective was to prospectively assess clinical outcomes for a pilot cohort of tibial shaft fractures treated with a new tibial nailing system that produces controlled axial interfragmentary micromotion. The hypothesis was that axial micromotion enhances fracture healing compared to static interlocking.

methodsPatients were treated in a single level I trauma centre over a 2.5-year period. Group allocation was not randomized; both the micromotion nail and standard-of-care static locking nails (control group) were commercially available and selected at the discretion of the treating surgeons. Injury risk levels were quantified using the Nonunion Risk Determination (NURD) score. Radiological healing was assessed until 24 weeks or clinical union. Low-dose CT scans were acquired at 12 weeks and virtual mechanical testing was performed to objectively assess structural bone healing.

resultsA total of 37 micromotion patients and 46 control patients were evaluated. There were no significant differences between groups in terms of age, sex, the proportion of open fractures, or NURD score. There were no nonunions (0%) in the micromotion group versus five (11%) in the control group. The proportion of fractures united was significantly higher in the micromotion group compared to control at 12 weeks (54% vs 30% united; p = 0.043), 18 weeks (81% vs 59%; p = 0.034), and 24 weeks (97% vs 74%; p = 0.005). Structural bone healing scores as assessed by CT scans tended to be higher with micromotion compared to control and this difference reached significance in patients who had biological comorbidities such as smoking.

conclusionIn this pilot study, micromotion fixation was associated with improved healing compared to standard tibial nailing. Further prospective clinical studies will be needed to assess the strength and generalizability of any potential benefits of micromotion fixation. Cite this article:

Indexed as

bone healingclinical outcomescomorbiditiesCT scanningfracture healingIntramedullary nailingMicromotion lockingnonunionsOpen fracturesorthopaedic traumaTibial Nailing

Identifiers

PMID34619989
PMCPMC8558444

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.