Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34619828›Full record

ArticleRadiation oncology journal2021

Combination of yttrium-90 radioembolization with stereotactic body radiation therapy in the treatment of portal vein tumor thrombosis.

Jason Liu, Colton Ladbury, Arya Amini, Scott Glaser, Jonathan Kessler, Aram Lee, Yi-Jen Chen

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Radiation oncology journal, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. SequentialAdvances in radiation oncology · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jason LiuDepartment of Radiation Oncology, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA, USA.
Colton LadburyDepartment of Radiation Oncology, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA, USA.
Arya AminiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA, USA.
Scott GlaserDepartment of Radiation Oncology, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA, USA.
Jonathan KesslerDepartment of Interventional Radiology, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA, USA.
Aram LeeDepartment of Interventional Radiology, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA, USA.
Yi-Jen ChenDepartment of Radiation Oncology, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA, USA.
City Of Hope National Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposePortal vein tumor thrombosis (PVTT) from cancer involving the liver carries a dismal prognosis, with median overall survival (OS) ranging from 2 to 5 months. While treatment with yttrium-90 (90Y) radioembolization alone may improve outcomes, overall prognosis remains poor. We hypothesize that the combination of 90Y radioembolization to the parenchymal component of the tumor and stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) to the vascular component is a safe and effective means of improving outcomes. MATERIALS AND

methodsA single center retrospective review identified 12 patients with cancers involving the liver who received both 90Y radioembolization and SBRT to the PVTT between May 2015 to August 2020. Primary endpoint was the 90-day toxicity rate by the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 5.0. Secondary endpoints were the best response rate based on the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors v1.1, local control rate, portal vein (PV) patency rate, and median OS.

resultsPatients received a median 90Y dose of 104.3 Gy (range, 83.3 to 131.7 Gy) and a median 5-fraction SBRT dose of 32.5 Gy (range, 27.5 to 50 Gy). There were no late toxicities reported, and only 7 acute grade 1 toxicities reported: elevation of liver function tests (17%), nausea (17%), fatigue (17%), and esophagitis (8%). Local control was 83%. 58% of patients had a patent PV after treatment. With a median follow-up time of 28 months, 1-year OS was 55% with a median OS of 14 months.

conclusionCombination 90Y radioembolization and SBRT appears to be safe and effective in the treatment of PVTT. Larger prospective studies are warranted to better evaluate this combination treatment approach.

Indexed as

Hepatocellular carcinomaLiverPortal veinStereotactic body radiotherapyTherapeutic embolization

Identifiers

PMID34619828
PMCPMC8497860
OpenAlexW3173651801

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.