Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34619682›Full record

ArticleInternational archives of allergy and immunology2022

Diagnostic Yield and Therapeutic Consequences of Targeted Next-Generation Sequencing in Sporadic Primary Immunodeficiency.

Georgios Sogkas, Natalia Dubrowinskaja, Katharina Schütz, Lars Steinbrück, Jasper Götting, Nicolaus Schwerk, Ulrich Baumann, Bodo Grimbacher, Torsten Witte, Reinhold E Schmidt and 1 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International archives of allergy and immunology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Georgios SogkasDepartment of Rheumatology and Immunology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.
Natalia DubrowinskajaDepartment of Rheumatology and Immunology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.
Katharina SchützDepartment of Pediatric Pneumology, Allergy and Neonatology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.
Lars SteinbrückInstitut of Virology Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.
Jasper GöttingInstitut of Virology Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.
Nicolaus SchwerkDepartment of Pediatric Pneumology, Allergy and Neonatology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.
Ulrich BaumannDepartment of Pediatric Pneumology, Allergy and Neonatology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.
Bodo GrimbacherHannover Medical School, Cluster of Excellence RESIST (EXC 2155), Hanover, Germany.
Torsten WitteDepartment of Rheumatology and Immunology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.
Reinhold E SchmidtDepartment of Rheumatology and Immunology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.
Faranaz AtschekzeiDepartment of Rheumatology and Immunology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.
Medizinische Hochschule Hannover · DEUniversity of Freiburg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionPrimary immunodeficiencies (PIDs) are a heterogeneous group of disorders characterized by increased susceptibility to infections, immune dysregulation, and/or malignancy. Genetic studies, especially during the last decade, led to a better understanding of the pathogenesis of primary immunodeficiencies and contributed to their classification into distinct monogenic disorders falling under one of the >430 currently known inborn errors of immunity (IEI). The growing availability of molecular genetic testing resulted in the increasing identification of patients with IEI. Here, we evaluated the diagnostic yield and the clinical consequences of targeted next-generation sequencing (tNGS) in a cohort of 294 primary immunodeficiency patients, primarily consisting of cases with sporadic primary antibody deficiency.

methodWe have custom designed a tNGS panel to sequence a cohort of PID patients. Agilent's HaloPlex Target Enrichment System for Illumina was used for DNA target enrichment.

resultstNGS identified a definite or predicted pathogenic variant in 15.3% of patients. The highest diagnostic rate was observed among patients with combined immunodeficiency or immune dysregulation, for whom genetic diagnosis may affect therapeutic decision-making.

conclusionNext-generation sequencing has changed diagnostic assignment and paved the way for targeted therapeutic intervention with agents directed at reverting the disease-causing molecular abnormality or its pathophysiological consequences. Therefore, such targeted therapies and identifying the genetic basis of PID can be essential for patients with manifested immune dysregulation as conventional immunomodulatory regimens may exert an immunosuppressive effect, aggravating their immunodeficiency or may only inadequately control autoimmune or lymphoproliferative manifestations.

Indexed as

Immunologic Deficiency SyndromesPrimary Immunodeficiency DiseasesCohort StudiesHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansCombined immunodeficiencyCommon variable immunodeficiencyInborn errors of immunityPrimary antibody deficienciesPrimary immunodeficiencyUnclassified antibody deficiency

Identifiers

PMID34619682
PMCPMC8985027
OpenAlexW3204644011

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.