Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34619200›Full record

ArticleThe Science of the total environment2022

Defining biological and biophysical properties of SARS-CoV-2 genetic material in wastewater.

Carolyn A Robinson, Hsin-Yeh Hsieh, Shu-Yu Hsu, Yang Wang, Braxton T Salcedo, Anthony Belenchia, Jessica Klutts, Sally Zemmer, Melissa Reynolds, Elizabeth Semkiw and 6 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Science of the total environment, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 57 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Crykey: Rapid Identification of SARS-CoV-2 Cryptic Mutations in Wastewater.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Patterns of SARS-CoV-2 circulation revealed by a nationwide sewage surveillance programme, the Netherlands, August 2020 to February 2022.Euro surveillance : bulletin Europeen sur les maladies transmissibles = European communicable disease bulletin · 2023
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. SARS-CoV-2 exposure in Norway rats (bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2022
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Carolyn A RobinsonDepartment of Molecular Microbiology and Immunology, University of Missouri, School of Medicine, Columbia, MO, USA; Christopher Bond Life Sciences Center, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, USA.
Hsin-Yeh HsiehSchool of Natural Resources, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, USA.
Shu-Yu HsuSchool of Natural Resources, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, USA; Center of Agroforestry, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, USA.
Yang WangDepartment of Molecular Microbiology and Immunology, University of Missouri, School of Medicine, Columbia, MO, USA; Christopher Bond Life Sciences Center, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, USA.
Braxton T SalcedoDepartment of Molecular Microbiology and Immunology, University of Missouri, School of Medicine, Columbia, MO, USA; Christopher Bond Life Sciences Center, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, USA.
Anthony BelenchiaBureau of Environmental Epidemiology, Division of Community and Public Health, Missouri Department of Health and Senior Services, Jefferson City, MO, USA.
Jessica KluttsWater Protection Program, Missouri Department of Natural Resources, Jefferson City, MO, USA.
Sally ZemmerWater Protection Program, Missouri Department of Natural Resources, Jefferson City, MO, USA.
Melissa ReynoldsBureau of Environmental Epidemiology, Division of Community and Public Health, Missouri Department of Health and Senior Services, Jefferson City, MO, USA.
Elizabeth SemkiwBureau of Environmental Epidemiology, Division of Community and Public Health, Missouri Department of Health and Senior Services, Jefferson City, MO, USA.
Trevor FoleyMissouri Department of Corrections, Jefferson City, MO, USA.
XiuFeng WanDepartment of Molecular Microbiology and Immunology, University of Missouri, School of Medicine, Columbia, MO, USA; Department of Electrical Engineering & Computer Science, College of Engineering, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, USA; Christopher Bond Life Sciences Center, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, USA.
Chris G WiebergWater Protection Program, Missouri Department of Natural Resources, Jefferson City, MO, USA.
Jeff WenzelBureau of Environmental Epidemiology, Division of Community and Public Health, Missouri Department of Health and Senior Services, Jefferson City, MO, USA.
Chung-Ho LinSchool of Natural Resources, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, USA; Center of Agroforestry, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, USA.
Marc C JohnsonDepartment of Molecular Microbiology and Immunology, University of Missouri, School of Medicine, Columbia, MO, USA; Christopher Bond Life Sciences Center, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, USA. Electronic address: marcjohnson@missouri.edu.
University of Missouri · USMissouri Department of Health and Senior Services · USMissouri Department of Natural Resources · US

Funding

Wastewater Detection of COVID-19U01DA053893 · NIDA · MISSOURI STATE DEPT/ HEALTH & SENIOR SRV · PI WENZEL, JEFF · 2021 to 2022
$4.0M
NIDA NIH HHS U01 DA053893
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

SARS-CoV-2 genetic material has been detected in raw wastewater around the world throughout the COVID-19 pandemic and has served as a useful tool for monitoring community levels of SARS-CoV-2 infections. SARS-CoV-2 genetic material is highly detectable in a patient's feces and the household wastewater for several days before and after a positive COVID-19 qPCR test from throat or sputum samples. Here, we characterize genetic material collected from raw wastewater samples and determine recovery efficiency during a concentration process. We find that pasteurization of raw wastewater samples did not reduce SARS-CoV-2 signal if RNA is extracted immediately after pasteurization. On the contrary, we find that signal decreased by approximately half when RNA was extracted 24-36 h post-pasteurization and ~90% when freeze-thawed prior to concentration. As a matrix control, we use an engineered enveloped RNA virus. Surprisingly, after concentration, the recovery of SARS-CoV-2 signal is consistently higher than the recovery of the control virus leading us to question the nature of the SARS-CoV-2 genetic material detected in wastewater. We see no significant difference in signal after different 24-hour temperature changes; however, treatment with detergent decreases signal ~100-fold. Furthermore, the density of the samples is comparable to enveloped retrovirus particles, yet, interestingly, when raw wastewater samples were used to inoculate cells, no cytopathic effects were seen indicating that wastewater samples do not contain infectious SARS-CoV-2. Together, this suggests that wastewater contains fully intact enveloped particles.

Indexed as

COVID-19VirusesHumansPandemicsSARS-CoV-2WastewaterWastewaterCoronavirusCOVID-19PasteurizationSewageSurveillanceWastewater

Identifiers

PMID34619200
PMCPMC8490134
OpenAlexW3203204455

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.