Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34619109›Full record

ArticleThe Lancet. Infectious diseases2021

The value of open-source clinical science in pandemic response: lessons from ISARIC.

ISARIC Clinical Characterisation Group

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Lancet. Infectious diseases, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Observational
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Observational
  18. Monkeypox: how will we know if the treatments work?The Lancet. Infectious diseases · 2022
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Global challenges in preparedness and response to epidemic infectious diseases.Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

ISARIC Clinical Characterisation Group

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_PC_15001Medical Research Council MC_PC_19025Medical Research Council MC_PC_19059Medical Research Council MR/S032304/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

Biomedical ResearchInformation DisseminationPandemicsCommunicable Disease ControlCOVID-19Global HealthHumansSARS-CoV-2

Identifiers

PMID34619109
PMCPMC8489876

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.