ArticlePloS one2021
Considering equity in global health collaborations: A qualitative study on experiences of equity.
Article in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
28 citing papers in PubMed, 47 citations in OpenAlex.
- Shifting power in global health research: a checklist for research funders.Global health action · 2026Article
- Addressing global health equity through Global Collaborative Evidence Networks: a narrative literature review of governance models, power and participation.Globalization and health · 2026Review
- Implementation research can enhance health research systems and reduce dependency on external aid.PLOS global public health · 2026Article
- Navigating the human gene editing scene and proposing a new governance framework in Africa: from knowledge to policy to action.Frontiers in genome editing · 2026Article
- Building Bridges: A framework for redefining and decolonizing implementation science in low- and middle-income countries.PLOS global public health · 2026Review
- A scoping review of equity toolkits for international academic partnerships.International journal for equity in health · 2025Article
- Establishing best practices guidelines for collaborative research in global surgery: developing a Delphi survey.Journal of global health · 2025Article
- Exoscopes in Neurosurgery: A Bibliometric and Visualization Analysis.Asian journal of neurosurgery · 2025Review
- Stronger together: advancing equity in global health research partnerships.BMJ global health · 2025Article
- Periodontal diseases in Africa.Periodontology 2000 · 2025Review
- Authorship Inequity in Global Health Research Conducted in Low- and Middle-Income Countries and Published in High-Income Country Family Medicine Journals.Annals of family medicine · 2025Article
- Exploring supportive roles for global north investigators in global health research.PLOS global public health · 2025Article
- Recommendations of the EANS Global and Humanitarian Neurosurgery Committee for sustainable neurosurgical partnerships in low-resource settings.Brain & spine · 2025Article
- Strengthening policy engagement when scaling up interventions targeting non-communicable diseases: insights from a qualitative study across 20 countries.Health policy and planning · 2024Article
- Overcoming barriers to single-cell RNA sequencing adoption in low- and middle-income countries.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2024Review
- Motivators and mechanisms for an international rural health collaboration.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Exploring equity in global health collaborations: a qualitative study of donor and recipient power dynamics in Liberia.BMJ global health · 2024Article
- Decolonising global health research: Shifting power for transformative change.PLOS global public health · 2024Review
- Portfolio analysis of global tobacco control research funding at the National Cancer Institute, 2000-2019.Tobacco prevention & cessation · 2024Article
- Challenges of biomedical research collaboration in India: Perceptions of Indian and international researchers.PloS one · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
International collaborations have become the standard model for global health research and often include researchers and institutions from high income countries (HICs) and low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). While such collaborations are important for generating new knowledge that will help address global health inequities, there is evidence to suggest that current forms of collaboration may reproduce unequal power relations. Therefore, we conducted a qualitative study with scientists, researchers and those involved in research management, working in international health collaborations. Interviews were conducted between October 2019 and March 2020. We conducted 13 interviews with 15 participants. From our findings, we derive three major themes. First, our results reflect characteristics of equitable, collaborative research relationships. Here we find both relational features, specifically trust and belonging, and structural features, including clear contractual agreements, capacity building, inclusive divisions of labour, and the involvement of local communities. Second, we discuss obstacles to develop equitable collaborations. These include exclusionary labour practices, donor-driven research agendas, overall research culture, lack of accountability and finally, the inadequate financing of indirect costs for LMIC institutions. Third, we discuss the responsibilities for promoting science equity of funders, LMIC researchers, LMIC institutions, and LMIC governments. While other empirical studies have suggested similar features of equity, our findings extend these features to include local communities as collaborators in research projects and not only as beneficiaries. We also suggest the importance of funders paying for indirect costs, without which the capacity of LMIC institutions will continually erode. And finally, our study shows the responsibilities of LMIC actors in developing equitable collaborations, which have largely been absent from the literature.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.