ArticleBehavioral neuroscience2022
Amygdala or hippocampus damage only minimally impacts affective responding to threat.
Article in Behavioral neuroscience, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Evaluation of registration-based vs. manual segmentation of rhesus macaque brain MRIs.Brain structure & function · 2024Article
- Reorganization in the macaque interoceptive-allostatic network following anterior cingulate cortex damage.Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991) · 2023Article
- The central extended amygdala guides survival-relevant tradeoffs: Implications for understanding common psychiatric disorders.Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews · 2022Article
- Social housing status impacts rhesus monkeys' affective responding in classic threat processing tasks.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Anterior Cingulate Cortex Ablation Disrupts Affective Vigor and Vigilance.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Decades of research studying the behavioral effects of damage to structures in medial temporal lobe of rhesus monkeys have documented that such damage, particularly damage to the amygdala, causes animals to become hyporesponsive to threat and hyper-social. This phenotype, a subset of the behaviors known as "Klüver-Bucy Syndrome," is one of the most well-known phenomena in behavioral neuroscience. Carrying on the tradition of evaluating hyposensitivity to threat in monkeys with temporal lobe lesions, we evaluated the responses of rhesus monkeys with bilateral ibotenic acid lesions of the amygdala or hippocampus and procedure-matched control animals to the presentation of an unfamiliar human intruder and threatening objects of varying complexity. All animals behaved as expected-calibrating their responses to the ostensible threat value of the stimuli such that they were most responsive to the most potent stimuli and least responsive to the least potent stimuli. Contrary to an earlier report (Mason et al., 2006), lesion status did not impact the pattern of responses across multiple dependent measures (overt behaviors, position in cage, etc.). The only lesion induced difference consistent with hyposensitivity to threat was that monkeys with amygdala lesions retrieved food rewards placed near reptile-like objects more rapidly than did control animals. These findings call into question the assumption that amygdala damage causes robust, stereotyped changes to affective behavior. They also highlight the importance of replication in neuroscientific studies using nonhuman primates. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.