SynthesisHead and neck pathology2022
Clear Cell Odontogenic Carcinoma a Systematic Review.
Synthesis in Head and neck pathology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.
- Malignant Odontogenic Tumors: A Clinicopathological Study of 53 Cases in Brazil.Head and neck pathology · 2026Article
- Salivary Hyalinizing Clear Cell Carcinoma and Odontogenic Clear Cell Carcinoma: A Case Series and a Scoping Review Comparing Clinicopathological Presentations.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- The Clear Cell Odontogenic Carcinoma: Case Report of a Rare Jaw Malignancy.Journal of maxillofacial and oral surgery · 2025Article
- Diagnostic Dilemma of Clear Cell Odontogenic Carcinoma Mimicking Various Pathological Entities: A Case Report and Literature Review.Clinical case reports · 2025Article
- A Novel Odontogenic Carcinoma with CDK4/MDM2 Co-Amplification: Expanding the Phenotypic Spectrum of Malignant Odontogenic Entities.Head and neck pathology · 2025Article
- Carbon-ion radiotherapy for clear cell odontogenic carcinomas.World journal of surgical oncology · 2024Article
- Case of metastatic clear cell odontogenic carcinoma with response to chemoimmunotherapy.BMJ case reports · 2024Article
- IL-33/ST2 Signaling and its Correlation with Macrophage Heterogeneity and Clinicopathologic Features in Human Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma.Current cancer drug targets · 2024Article
- A Current Review of Machine Learning and Deep Learning Models in Oral Cancer Diagnosis: Recent Technologies, Open Challenges, and Future Research Directions.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Unusual Presentation of Clear Cell Odontogenic Carcinoma: Case Report and Literature Review.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 8 institutions in 5 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Clear cell Odontogenic Carcinoma (CCOC) is an uncommon malignant odontogenic tumor (MOT). It is the fifth most common MOT. A systematic review is presented of reported cases, case series and retrospective studies of CCOC, to determine trends in presentation, diagnostic features, treatment, and patient outcome. Searches of detailed databases were carried out to identify papers reporting CCOC. The variables were demographics, patient symptoms, tumor location, histopathological findings, immunohistochemical studies, treatment, follow-up, and recurrence. 117 cases were identified; CCOC was most frequently seen in mature females 65% (n = 76). The total average age was 55.4 with a range from 17 to 89 years, for females 56.4 and males 53.6 years. The mean size was 3.41 cm. The most common location was in the mandibular body 36.2% (n = 42), followed by the anterior mandible 23.3% (n = 27). The most common clinical presentation was a swelling 80.4% (n = 74), and the main symptom was pain 41.3% (n = 31), followed by painless lesion 24% (n = 18). The most common Immunohistochemistry positive expression was CK19, EMA, and CEA, and for special staining periodic acid Shiff (PAS); 97% of cases were treated surgically. The average follow-up was 30.3 months, and recurrence was reported in 52.4% of the cases. Conclusion: CCOC shows a strong predilection for the body and anterior mandible, and females are more frequently affected. CCOCs can be painful and the principle clinical sign is swelling, CCOCs can metastasize, and the prognosis is fair.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.