Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34618289›Full record

ArticleEcotoxicology (London, England)2021

Levels of hydrocarbons and toxicity of water-soluble fractions of maritime fuels on neotropical invertebrates.

Debora Cristina Nascimento de Santana, Fernando Cesar Perina, Rafael André Lourenço, Josilene da Silva, Lucas Buruaem Moreira, Denis Moledo de Souza Abessa

Open access · greenAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Ecotoxicology (London, England), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Cyanide Removal by ZnTiOInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Debora Cristina Nascimento de SantanaNúcleo de Estudos em Poluição e Ecotoxicologia Aquática (NEPEA), Câmpus do Litoral Paulista da Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), São Vicente, SP, Brazil.
Fernando Cesar PerinaNúcleo de Estudos em Poluição e Ecotoxicologia Aquática (NEPEA), Câmpus do Litoral Paulista da Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), São Vicente, SP, Brazil.
Rafael André LourençoInstituto Oceanográfico, Universidade de São Paulo (IO-USP), São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Josilene da SilvaInstituto Oceanográfico, Universidade de São Paulo (IO-USP), São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Lucas Buruaem MoreiraNúcleo de Estudos em Poluição e Ecotoxicologia Aquática (NEPEA), Câmpus do Litoral Paulista da Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), São Vicente, SP, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7863-085X
Denis Moledo de Souza AbessaNúcleo de Estudos em Poluição e Ecotoxicologia Aquática (NEPEA), Câmpus do Litoral Paulista da Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), São Vicente, SP, Brazil. denis.abessa@unesp.br.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4609-1668
Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp) · BRUniversidade de São Paulo · BRUniversidade Paulista · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Accidents involving fuels and oil spills are among the main sources of hydrocarbons to the marine ecosystems and often damage the biota. Diesel and bunker oil are two examples of fuels with broad application that release hydrocarbons to the aquatic environment and little is known about their toxicity on tropical organisms. This study aimed to assess the toxicity of the water-soluble fraction (WSF) of diesel and bunker oils to neotropical marine invertebrates. Commercial fuels were purchased for WSF extraction, analyzed for total petroleum hydrocarbons (TPH), and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), and acute and chronic toxicity determined. The WSF analyzed contained varied levels of TPH and PAHs mixtures, especially low molecular weight PAHs; bunker WSF presented higher amounts of TPH and PAHs. Both WSFs tested produced significant mortality of the brine shrimp Artemia salina, affected the reproduction rate of the copepod Nitokra sp, and impaired the embryo-larval development of the mussel Perna perna and of the sea urchin Lytechinus variegatus. In general WSF from diesel was more toxic to the organisms tested, but bunker WSF was more toxic to embryos of L. variegatus. Toxicity started from concentrations of 3% WSF, which can be environmentally relevant after an oil spill, indicating that marine biota may be adversely affected in short term.

Indexed as

CopepodaPetroleumPetroleum PollutionPolycyclic Aromatic HydrocarbonsWater Pollutants, ChemicalAnimalsEcosystemHydrocarbonsWaterHydrocarbonsPetroleumPolycyclic Aromatic HydrocarbonsWaterWater Pollutants, ChemicalMarine ecotoxicologyMarine pollutionOil spillsPolycyclic aromatic hydrocarbonsSpecies sensitivityTotal petroleum hydrocarbons

Identifiers

PMID34618289
OpenAlexW3204312875

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.