Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34618234›Full record

Observational studySchmerz (Berlin, Germany)2022

[Results of a pilot study on the role of therapy expectation in interdisciplinary multimodal pain therapy for chronic back pain].

Dustin Maser, Daniel Müller, Ulrike Bingel, Diana Müßgens

Open access · hybridAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Schmerz (Berlin, Germany), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Dustin MaserKlinik für Neurologie, Zentrum für Translationale Neuro- und Verhaltenswissenschaften und Zentrum für universitäre Schmerzmedizin, Universitätsklinikum Essen (AöR), Hufelandstraße 55, 45147, Essen, Deutschland. dustin.maser@uk-essen.de.
Daniel MüllerKlinik für Neurologie, Zentrum für Translationale Neuro- und Verhaltenswissenschaften und Zentrum für universitäre Schmerzmedizin, Universitätsklinikum Essen (AöR), Hufelandstraße 55, 45147, Essen, Deutschland.
Ulrike BingelKlinik für Neurologie, Zentrum für Translationale Neuro- und Verhaltenswissenschaften und Zentrum für universitäre Schmerzmedizin, Universitätsklinikum Essen (AöR), Hufelandstraße 55, 45147, Essen, Deutschland.
Diana MüßgensKlinik für Neurologie, Zentrum für Translationale Neuro- und Verhaltenswissenschaften und Zentrum für universitäre Schmerzmedizin, Universitätsklinikum Essen (AöR), Hufelandstraße 55, 45147, Essen, Deutschland.
Essen University Hospital · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundChronic low back pain is a serious persistent illness with profound personal and socioeconomic impact. Interdisciplinary multimodal pain therapy (IMPT) is one of the few evidence-based treatment options for chronic pain. Although it is known that pain perception, as well as its chronification and treatment are affected by patient expectations, only few clinical interventions or guidelines on how to modulate these effects exist.

objectivesThe aim of this study was to demonstrate the impact of expectancy as a predictor for pain and related outcomes. To this end, we will present explorative pilot data from an observational cohort at our clinic.

methodsThe study shows preliminary data of a prospective longitudinal observational study of up to 41 chronic back pain patients who followed an IMPT at the back pain center in Essen. Data were collected at admission (T0), at discharge (T1), and 3 months after discharge (T2). Primary outcomes were pain intensity and disability. Additionally, we measured treatment expectancy at admission. We used linear regression to analyze the impact of pretreatment expectancy on the primary outcome measures.

resultsIMPT led to a significant improvement in pain intensity and disability. The effect on pain intensity was stable over three months after discharge and disability declined even further. Expectancy was a significant predictor of improvement in pain intensity and explained approximately 15% of the variance. DISCUSSION: Expectancy is an important predictor of treatment outcome in IMPT. In clinical practice, valid methods should therefore be established to reduce negative and promote positive expectations.

Indexed as

Chronic PainMotivationBack PainHumansPilot ProjectsProspective StudiesTreatment OutcomeChronic back painInterdisciplinary multimodal pain therapy (IMPT)Longitudinal observational studyPlaceboTreatment expectancy

Identifiers

PMID34618234
PMCPMC9156493
OpenAlexW3204631406

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.