Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34618208›Full record

ReviewZeitschrift fur Rheumatologie2021

[Artificial intelligence-supported treatment in rheumatology : Principles, current situation and perspectives].

Thomas Hügle, Maria Kalweit

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Zeitschrift fur Rheumatologie, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Thomas HügleAbteilung Rheumatologie, Universitätsspital Lausanne (CHUV) und Universität Lausanne, Avenue Pierre-Decker 4, 1011, Lausanne, Schweiz. Thomas.Hugle@chuv.ch.
Maria KalweitInstitut für Informatik, Albert-Ludwigs-Universität Freiburg, Universität Freiburg im Breisgau, Georges-Koehler-Allee 80, 79110, Freiburg im Breisgau, Deutschland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Computer-guided clinical decision support systems have been finding their way into practice for some time, mostly integrated into electronic medical records. The primary goals are to improve the quality of treatment, save time and avoid errors. These are mostly rule-based algorithms that recognize drug interactions or provide reminder functions. Through artificial intelligence (AI), clinical decision support systems can be disruptively further developed. New knowledge is constantly being created from data through machine learning in order to predict the individual course of a patient's disease, identify phenotypes or support treatment decisions. Such algorithms already exist for rheumatological diseases. Automated image recognition and disease prediction in rheumatoid arthritis are the most advanced; however, these have not yet been sufficiently tested or integrated into existing decision support systems. Rather than dictating the AI-assisted choice of treatment to the doctor, future clinical decision systems are seen as hybrid decision support, always involving both the expert and the patient. There is also a great need for security through comprehensible and auditable algorithms to sustainably guarantee the quality and transparency of AI-assisted treatment recommendations in the long term.

Indexed as

Decision Support Systems, ClinicalRheumatologyAlgorithmsArtificial IntelligenceHumansMachine LearningAlgorithmsAutomated image recognitionDecision supportDecision systemsTreatment recommendations

Identifiers

PMID34618208
PMCPMC8651581

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.