Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34618190›Full record

ArticleArchives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery2022

Peri-implant fracture: a rare complication after intramedullary fixation of trochanteric femoral fracture.

Lauri M Halonen, Antti Stenroos, Henri Vasara, Jussi Kosola

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Peri-implant fractures after Intramedullary fixation for femoral trochanteric fracture: a multicenter (TRON Group) study.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2024
    Article
  12. Therapy aspects of peri-implant femoral fractures-a retrospective analysis of 64 patients.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2024
    Article
  13. [Research progress on distal interlocking screws of cephalomedullary nails in intertrochanteric fractures].Zhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery · 2024
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Lauri M HalonenDepartment of Orthopedics and Traumatology, South Karelia Central Hospital, University of Helsinki, Valto Käkelän katu 3, 53130, Lappeenranta, Finland. lauri.halonen@eksote.fi.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3978-9136
Antti StenroosDepartment of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Helsinki University Hospital, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4394-2826
Henri VasaraDepartment of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Helsinki University Hospital, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4438-4523
Jussi KosolaDepartment of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Kanta-Häme Central Hospital, Hämeenlinna, Finland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4428-7472
University of Helsinki · FIKanta-Hämeen Keskussairaala · FI

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionTrochanteric femoral fractures are among the most common operatively treated fractures. Intramedullary fixation has become the treatment of choice in many centers around the world. Nevertheless, the knowledge of rare complications of these fractures is limited. In this study, the incidence and treatment strategies for peri-implant fractures (PIF) were assessed. MATERIALS AND

methodsA single-center retrospective cohort study was done on 987 consecutive operatively treated trochanteric fractures. PFNA cephalomedullary nail was used as a fixation method. All patients were followed up from patient records for peri-implant fractures. Plain radiographs as well as different salvage methods were analyzed and compared.

resultsThe total rate of peri-implant fractures was 1.4% (n = 14). The rate of PIF for patients treated with short (200 mm) nails, intermediate-length (240 mm) nails, and long nails was 2.7% (n = 2), 1.5% (n = 11), and 0.7% (n = 1), respectively (ns, p > 0.05 for difference). Treatment of choice for PIF was either ORIF with locking plate (57%, n = 8) or exchange nailing (43%, n = 6). None of the PIF patients needed additional surgeries for non-union, malunion, or delayed union.

conclusionsA PIF is a rare complication of intramedullary fixation of trochanteric fractures. It can be treated with either locking plates or exchange nailing with sufficient results. There are no grounds for favoring long nails to avoid PIFs.

Indexed as

Fracture Fixation, IntramedullaryHip FracturesPeriprosthetic FracturesBone NailsHumansRetrospective StudiesComplicationHip fracturePeri-implant fractureTrochanteric fracture

Identifiers

PMID34618190
PMCPMC9596516
OpenAlexW3203234809

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.