Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34617886›Full record

ArticleThe journal of international advanced otology2021

Cross-Modal Cortical Activity in the Brain Can Predict Cochlear Implantation Outcome in Adults: A Machine Learning Study.

Jeong-Sug Kyong, Myung-Whan Suh, Jae Joon Han, Moo Kyun Park, Tae Soo Noh, Seung Ha Oh, Jun Ho Lee

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The journal of international advanced otology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Jeong-Sug KyongDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea; Audiology Institute, Hallym University of Graduate Studies, Seoul, Korea.
Myung-Whan SuhDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea.
Jae Joon HanDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea; Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Soonchunhyang University Hospital, Seoul, Korea.
Moo Kyun ParkDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea.
Tae Soo NohDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea.
Seung Ha OhDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea.
Jun Ho LeeDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesPrediction of cochlear implantation (CI) outcome is often difficult because outcomes vary among patients. Though the brain plasticity across modalities during deafness is associated with individual CI outcomes, longitudinal observations in multiple patients are scarce. Therefore, we sought a prediction system based on cross-modal plasticity in a longitudinal study with multiple patients.

methodsClassification of CI outcomes between excellent or poor was tested based on the features of brain cross-modal plasticity, measured using event-related responses and their corresponding electromagnetic sources. A machine learning estimation model was applied to 13 datasets from 3 patients based on linear supervised training. Classification efficiency was evaluated comparing prediction accuracy, sensitivity/specificity, total mis-classification cost, and training time among feature set conditions.

resultsCombined feature sets with the sensor and source levels dramatically improved classification accuracy between excellent and poor outcomes. Specifically, the tactile feature set best explained CI outcome (accuracy, 98.83 ± 2.57%; sensitivity, 98.00 ± 0.01%; specificity, 98.15 ± 4.26%; total misclassification cost, 0.17 ± 0.38; training time, 0.51 ± 0.09 sec), followed by the visual feature (accuracy, 93.50 ± 4.89%; sensitivity, 89.17 ± 8.16%; specificity, 98.00 ± 0.01%; total misclassification cost, 0.65 ± 0.49; training time, 0.38 ± 0.50 sec).

conclusionIndividual tactile and visual processing in the brain best classified the current status when classified by combined sensor-source level features. Our results suggest that cross-modal brain plasticity due to deafness may provide a basis for classifying the status. We expect this novel method to contribute to the evaluation and prediction of CI outcomes.

Indexed as

Auditory CortexCochlear ImplantationCochlear ImplantsDeafnessAdultBrainHumansLongitudinal StudiesMachine Learning

Identifiers

PMID34617886
PMCPMC8975390

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.