Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34617696›Full record

Observational studySingapore medical journal2023

Early mobilisation following fragility hip fracture surgery: current trends and association with discharge outcomes in a local tertiary hospital.

Shumei Tan, Aswinkumar Vasireddy

Registry-linked trialOpen access · diamondAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Singapore medical journal, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06212622 (Is the Rate of Early Mobilisation in Hip Fracture Patients Using Alfentanil Better Than Standard Opioid Analgesia), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 44% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06212622 completednot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Is the Rate of Early Mobilisation in Hip Fracture Patients Using Alfentanil Better Than Standard Opioid Analgesia (REHAB): a Prospective Cohort Study

TypeobservationalSponsorNHS LothianRan2024 to 2024Enrolled64ConditionsHip Injuries, Hip Fractures, Pain, Post Operative PainArmsAlfentanil, Oxycodone
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Shumei TanDepartment of Rehabilitative Services, Changi General Hospital, Singapore; Blizard Institute, Barts and the London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, UK.
Aswinkumar VasireddyBlizard Institute, Barts and the London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London; Department of Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgery, King's College Hospital, London, UK.
Queen Mary University of London · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Postoperative day 1 (POD 1) mobilisation is a key clinical indicator for the fragility hip fracture surgery population. This study aimed to evaluate the current trends of POD 1 mobilisation at our institution and to review the relationships between early mobilisation and outcomes of early functional recovery, length of stay (LOS) and discharge destination. Methods: In this preliminary observational study, data pertaining to demographics, premorbid function, health status, injury and surgical factors, POD 1 mobilisation status and clinical outcomes of interest were retrieved from eligible patients. Patients who attained POD 1 ambulation formed the early ambulation (EA) group, while the remaining patients formed the delayed ambulation (DA) group. Data were analysed for any significant difference between the groups. Results: One hundred and fifteen patients were included in the analysis. The rate of patients achieving at least sitting out of bed on POD 1 was 80.0% (n=92), which was comparable to the data available from international hip fracture audit databases. There were 55 (47.8%) patients in the EA group and 60 (52.5%) patients in the DA group. The EA group was approximately nine times more likely to achieve independence in ambulation at discharge compared to the DA group (adjusted odds ratio 9.20, 95% confidence interval 1.50-56.45; P = 0.016). There were observed trends of shorter LOS and more proportion of home discharge in the EA group compared to the DA group (P > 0.05). Conclusion: This is the first local study to offer benchmark of the POD 1 mobilisation status for this population. Patients who attained POD 1 ambulation had better early functional recovery.

Indexed as

Early AmbulationHip FracturesHumansLength of StayPatient DischargePhysical Therapy ModalitiesTertiary Care CentersBenchmarkingdischarge outcomesearly ambulationhip fracturesinpatients

Identifiers

PMID34617696
PMCPMC10775299
OpenAlexW3203662173

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.