Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34617681›Full record

ReviewClinical obesity2022

The development of a core outcomes set for self-management interventions for patients living with obesity.

Claudia Valli, Rosa Suñol, Carola Orrego, Ena Niño de Guzmán, Valentina Strammiello, Nina Adrion, Kaisa Immonen, Lyudmil Ninov, Marieke van der Gaag, Marta Ballester and 1 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical obesity, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

Claudia ValliIberoamerican Cochrane Centre Barcelona-Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Public Health, Biomedical Research Institute Sant Pau (IIB Sant Pau), Barcelona, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4393-3690
Rosa SuñolUniversitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Carola OrregoUniversitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Ena Niño de GuzmánIberoamerican Cochrane Centre Barcelona-Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Public Health, Biomedical Research Institute Sant Pau (IIB Sant Pau), Barcelona, Spain.
Valentina StrammielloEuropean Patients' Forum (EPF), Brussels, Belgium.
Nina AdrionOptiMedis AG, Hamburg, Germany.
Kaisa ImmonenEuropean Patients' Forum (EPF), Brussels, Belgium.
Lyudmil NinovEuropean Patients' Forum (EPF), Brussels, Belgium.
Marieke van der GaagNetherlands Institute for Health Services Research (Nivel), The Netherlands.
Marta BallesterUniversitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Pablo Alonso-CoelloIberoamerican Cochrane Centre Barcelona-Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Public Health, Biomedical Research Institute Sant Pau (IIB Sant Pau), Barcelona, Spain.
Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona · ESEuropean Federation of Allergy and Airways Diseases Patients Associations · BEHAW Hamburg · DEIberoamerican Cochrane Centre · ESNetherlands Institute for Health Services Research · NL

Funding

EU Horizon 2020 754936
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Self-management interventions (SMIs) can improve the life of patients living with obesity. However, there is variability in the outcomes used to assess the effectiveness of SMIs and these are often not relevant for patients. In the context of COMPAR-EU, our aim was to develop a core outcome set (COS) for the evaluation of SMIs for patients with obesity. We followed a four steps multimethod approach: (1) the development of the initial catalogue of outcomes; (2) a scoping review of reviews on patients' values and preferences on outcomes of self-management (SM); (3) a Delphi survey including patients and patient representatives to rate the importance of outcomes; and (4) a 2-day consensus workshop with patients, patient representatives, healthcare professionals and researchers. The initial catalogue included 82 outcomes. Ten patients and patient's representatives participated in the Delphi survey. We identified 16 themes through the thematic synthesis of the scoping review that informed 37.80% of the outcomes on initial catalogue. Five patients, five healthcare professionals, and four researchers participated in the consensus workshop. After the consensus process, 15 outcomes were selected to be part of the final COS, and five supplementary outcomes were also provided. We developed a COS for the evaluation of SMIs in obesity with a significant involvement of patients and other key stakeholders. This COS will help improving data synthesis and increasing the value of SM research data in healthcare decision making.

Indexed as

Self-ManagementConsensusDelphi TechniqueHumansObesityOutcome Assessment, Health CareResearch DesignTreatment Outcomecore outcome setobesitypatientsself-management interventions

Identifiers

PMID34617681
PMCPMC9285702
OpenAlexW3201883919

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.