Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34617562›Full record

ArticleThe American journal of clinical nutrition2022

A posteriori dietary patterns better explain variations of the gut microbiome than individual markers in the American Gut Project.

Aurélie Cotillard, Agnès Cartier-Meheust, Nicole S Litwin, Soline Chaumont, Mathilde Saccareau, Franck Lejzerowicz, Julien Tap, Hana Koutnikova, Diana Gutierrez Lopez, Daniel McDonald and 4 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The American journal of clinical nutrition, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 56 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
56citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
7.8field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

56 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 72 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Roles of the gut microbiome in weight management.Nature reviews. Microbiology · 2023
    Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. The gut microbiome connects nutrition and human health.Nature reviews. Gastroenterology & hepatology · 2025
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Aurélie CotillardDanone Nutricia Research, Palaiseau, France.
Agnès Cartier-MeheustDanone Nutricia Research, Palaiseau, France.
Nicole S LitwinCenter for Microbiome Innovation, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA.
Soline ChaumontDanone Nutricia Research, Palaiseau, France.
Mathilde SaccareauSoladis, Paris, France.
Franck LejzerowiczCenter for Microbiome Innovation, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA.
Julien TapDanone Nutricia Research, Palaiseau, France.ORCID 0000-0001-8998-5413
Hana KoutnikovaDanone Nutricia Research, Palaiseau, France.
Diana Gutierrez LopezCenter for Microbiome Innovation, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA.
Daniel McDonaldDepartment of Pediatrics, School of Medicine, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA.
Se Jin SongCenter for Microbiome Innovation, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA.
Rob KnightCenter for Microbiome Innovation, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA.
Muriel DerrienDanone Nutricia Research, Palaiseau, France.
Patrick VeigaDanone Nutricia Research, Palaiseau, France.
Danone (France) · FRUniversity of California San Diego · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIndividual diet components and specific dietary regimens have been shown to impact the gut microbiome.

objectivesHere, we explored the contribution of long-term diet by searching for dietary patterns that would best associate with the gut microbiome in a population-based cohort.

methodsUsing a priori and a posteriori approaches, we constructed dietary patterns from an FFQ completed by 1800 adults in the American Gut Project. Dietary patterns were defined as groups of participants or combinations of food variables (factors) driven by criteria ranging from individual nutrients to overall diet. We associated these patterns with 16S ribosomal RNA-based gut microbiome data for a subset of 744 participants.

resultsCompared to individual features (e.g., fiber and protein), or to factors representing a reduced number of dietary features, 5 a posteriori dietary patterns based on food groups were best associated with gut microbiome beta diversity (P ≤ 0.0002). Two patterns followed Prudent-like diets-Plant-Based and Flexitarian-and exhibited the highest Healthy Eating Index 2010 (HEI-2010) scores. Two other patterns presented Western-like diets with a gradient in HEI-2010 scores. A fifth pattern consisted mostly of participants following an Exclusion diet (e.g., low carbohydrate). Notably, gut microbiome alpha diversity was significantly lower in the most Western pattern compared to the Flexitarian pattern (P ≤ 0.009), and the Exclusion diet pattern was associated with low relative abundance of Bifidobacterium (P ≤ 1.2 × 10-7), which was better explained by diet than health status.

conclusionsWe demonstrated that global-diet a posteriori patterns were more associated with gut microbiome variations than individual dietary features among adults in the United States. These results confirm that evaluating diet as a whole is important when studying the gut microbiome. It will also facilitate the design of more personalized dietary strategies in general populations.

Indexed as

Nutritional Physiological PhenomenaAdultDietDiet, HealthyDiet SurveysFecesFemaleGastrointestinal MicrobiomeHumansMaleRNA, Ribosomal, 16SUnited StatesRNA, Ribosomal, 16S16S rRNA gene sequencingalpha diversityAmerican Gut Projectbeta diversitycohort studydietary patternsfood frequency questionnairegut microbiomeHealthy Eating Index

Identifiers

PMID34617562
PMCPMC8827078
OpenAlexW3202477264

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.