Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34617414›Full record

ArticleAdvanced healthcare materials2021

Dual Extrusion Patterning Drives Tissue Development Aesthetics and Shape Retention in 3D Printed Nipple-Areola Constructs.

Sarah Van Belleghem, Bhushan Mahadik, Kirstie Snodderly, Zoe Mote, Bin Jiang, Justine R Yu, Shannon McLoughlin, Xiaoming He, Arthur J Nam, John P Fisher

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Advanced healthcare materials, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Sarah Van BelleghemFischell Department of Bioengineering, University of Maryland, College Park, 20742, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6265-6502
Bhushan MahadikFischell Department of Bioengineering, University of Maryland, College Park, 20742, USA.
Kirstie SnodderlyFischell Department of Bioengineering, University of Maryland, College Park, 20742, USA.
Zoe MoteFischell Department of Bioengineering, University of Maryland, College Park, 20742, USA.
Bin JiangFischell Department of Bioengineering, University of Maryland, College Park, 20742, USA.
Justine R YuFischell Department of Bioengineering, University of Maryland, College Park, 20742, USA.
Shannon McLoughlinFischell Department of Bioengineering, University of Maryland, College Park, 20742, USA.
Xiaoming HeFischell Department of Bioengineering, University of Maryland, College Park, 20742, USA.
Arthur J NamDivision of Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery, R Adams Cowley Shock Trauma Center, University of Maryland, School of Medicine, Baltimore, 21201, USA.
John P FisherFischell Department of Bioengineering, Center for Engineering Complex Tissues, University of Maryland, College Park, 20742, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4019-348X

Funding

Training and Dissemination CoreP41EB023833 · NIBIB · UNIV OF MARYLAND, COLLEGE PARK · PI MIKOS, ANTONIOS G. · 2017 to 2021
$6.2M
NIBIB NIH HHS P41 EB023833
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Breast cancer and its most radical treatment, the mastectomy, significantly impose both physical transformations and emotional pain in thousands of women across the globe. Restoring the natural appearance of a nipple-areola complex directly on the reconstructed breast represents an important psychological healing experience for these women and remains an unresolved clinical challenge, as current restorative techniques render a flattened disfigured skin tab within a single year. To provide a long-term solution for nipple reconstruction, this work presents 3D printed hybrid scaffolds composed of complementary biodegradable gelatin methacrylate and synthetic non-degradable poly(ethylene) glycol hydrogels to foster the regeneration of a viable nipple-areola complex. In vitro results showcased the robust structural capacity and long-term shape retention of the nipple projection amidst internal fibroblastic contraction, while in vivo subcutaneous implantation of the 3D printed nipple-areola demonstrated minimal fibrotic encapsulation, neovascularization, and the formation of healthy granulation tissue. Envisioned as subdermal implants, these nipple-areola bioprinted regenerative grafts have the potential to transform the appearance of the newly reconstructed breast, reduce subsequent surgical intervention, and revolutionize breast reconstruction practices.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsNipplesEstheticsFemaleHumansMastectomyPrinting, Three-Dimensional3D printingbreast reconstructioncomposite scaffoldsgelatin methacrylatenipple-areola constructspoly(ethylene) glycol

Identifiers

PMID34617414
PMCPMC8665136

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.