ArticleInternal medicine journal2022
Social distancing and bacteraemia in the time of COVID-19.
Article in Internal medicine journal, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Rise in complications of acute otitis media during and after the COVID-19 pandemic.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2024Article
- Post-COVID-19 Pandemic Rebound of Macrolide-ResistantAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on blood culture practices and bloodstream infections.Microbiology spectrum · 2023Article
- Fear of dying dirty: Intimate care encounters during COVID-19 pandemic in South African context.Health SA = SA Gesondheid · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSocial distancing was the predominant strategy used to mitigate the spread of Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) at the start of the COVID-19 pandemic.
aimsTo study the impact of social distancing on the incidence of bacteraemia. The number of admitted patients with positive blood cultures in April-May 2020 in one tertiary medical centre was compared with the number during the same period in the previous 3 years (April-May 2017-2019).
methodsRetrospective review of all positive blood cultures from January to July in the years 2017-2020.
resultsThere were fewer cases of Streptococcus bacteraemia as well as coagulase-negative Staphylococcus bacteraemia and other possible contaminated blood cultures in April-May 2020. Compared with the previous 3 years, the incidence of Streptococcus pneumoniae bacteraemia among all bacteraemias was lower in April-May 2020 (5%) than in 2017-2019 (12.0%; 95% confidence interval 10.3-14.1%). In general, fewer cases of bacteraemia caused by oropharynx organisms were observed in April-May 2020; only 6 cases versus 31 (95% confidence interval 10-53) during the same period in 2017-2019. Only one case of S. pneumoniae bacteraemia was observed in April-May 2020 and its percentage among all bacteraemias was lower in April-May 2020 (0.4%) than during the same period in 2017-2019 (3.3%).
conclusionThe incidences of streptococcal bacteraemia and bacteraemia of organisms transmitted through respiratory secretions were lower when there were social distancing restrictions. Adopting measures of social distancing may decrease the morbidity from bacteraemia caused by oropharynx and respiratory bacteria.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.