Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34617336›Full record

ArticleProteins2022

Conformational variability in proteins bound to single-stranded DNA: A new benchmark for new docking perspectives.

Dominique Mias-Lucquin, Isaure Chauvot de Beauchene

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proteins, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Dominique Mias-LucquinLORIA, Universite de Lorraine, Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, France.ORCID 0000-0002-9967-937X
Isaure Chauvot de BeaucheneLORIA, Universite de Lorraine, Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, France.ORCID 0000-0002-7035-3042

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We explored the Protein Data Bank (PDB) to collect protein-ssDNA structures and create a multi-conformational docking benchmark including both bound and unbound protein structures. Due to ssDNA high flexibility when not bound, no ssDNA unbound structure is included in the benchmark. For the 91 sequence-identity groups identified as bound-unbound structures of the same protein, we studied the conformational changes in the protein induced by the ssDNA binding. Moreover, based on several bound or unbound protein structures in some groups, we also assessed the intrinsic conformational variability in either bound or unbound conditions and compared it to the supposedly binding-induced modifications. To illustrate a use case of this benchmark, we performed docking experiments using ATTRACT docking software. This benchmark is, to our knowledge, the first one made to peruse available structures of ssDNA-protein interactions to such an extent, aiming to improve computational docking tools dedicated to this kind of molecular interactions.

Indexed as

Computational BiologyDatabases, ProteinDNA, Single-StrandedMolecular ConformationMolecular Docking SimulationProtein BindingProtein ConformationProteinsSoftwareDNA, Single-StrandedProteinsbenchmarkmolecular docking analysissingle-stranded DNAsingle-stranded DNA-binding protein

Identifiers

PMID34617336
PMCPMC9292434

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.