Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34617216›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental science and pollution research international2022

A study on the contamination assessment, health risk and mobility of two heavy metals in the soil-plants-ruminants system of a typical agricultural region in the semi arid environment.

Xiaoping Ge, Zafar Iqbal Khan, Fu Chen, Mubeen Akhtar, Kafeel Ahmad, Abid Ejaz, Muhammad Arslan Ashraf, Muhammad Nadeem, Shahzad Akhtar, Jawaher Alkahtani and 2 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental science and pollution research international, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

Xiaoping GeCollege of Hydrology and Water Resources, Hohai University, Nanjing, China.
Zafar Iqbal KhanDepartment of Botany, University of Sargodha, Sargodha, Pakistan. zafar.khan@uos.edu.pk.
Fu ChenLow Carbon Energy Institute, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou, China.
Mubeen AkhtarDepartment of Botany, University of Sargodha, Sargodha, Pakistan.
Kafeel AhmadDepartment of Botany, University of Sargodha, Sargodha, Pakistan.
Abid EjazDepartment of Botany, University of Sargodha, Sargodha, Pakistan.
Muhammad Arslan AshrafDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Sargodha, Sub-campus, Bhakkar, Pakistan.
Muhammad NadeemInstitute of Food Science and Nutrition, University of Sargodha, Sargodha, Pakistan.
Shahzad AkhtarDepartment of Botany, University of Sargodha, Sargodha, Pakistan.
Jawaher AlkahtaniDepartment of Botany and Microbiology, College of Science, King Saud University, Riyadh, 11451, Saudi Arabia.
Yheni DwiningsihDepartment of Crop, Soil and Environmental Sciences, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR, USA.
Mohamed S ElshikhDepartment of Botany and Microbiology, College of Science, King Saud University, Riyadh, 11451, Saudi Arabia.
University of Sargodha · PKKing Saud University · SAChina University of Mining and Technology · CNHohai University · CNUniversity of Arkansas at Fayetteville · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study's aim was to investigate iron (Fe) and zinc (Zn) concentration in the soil, forage crops, and sheep blood with respect to the seasonal availability of these metals. Soil, forage, and sheep blood samples were sampled from five different locations in Chakwal (Pidh, Tobar, Ratoccha, Choa Saiden Shah-Kalar Kahar road, and Choa Saiden Shan-Chakwal Road) during two seasons, i.e., winter and summer. All the samples were processed through wet acid digestion for evaluation of metal contents. Because of proximity of site-1 and site-2 to coal mines, higher Fe concentration was observed than Zn. Overall, varied Fe concentrations obtained in soil were 12.95-24.31 mg/kg, 1.29-9.61 mg/kg in forage and 1.17-24 mg/l in blood, whereas Zn values were 1.04-31.9 mg/kg, 1.96-7.02 mg/kg, and 0.16-6.52 mg/l for soil, forages, and blood respectively. The pollution load index value for both Fe (0.01-0.14 mg/kg) and Zn (0.02-0.72 mg/kg) was lesser than 1. Bio-concentration (0.09-2.64mg/kg) and enrichment factor (0.08-7.51 mg/kg) were showing efficient transfer of metals through the food chain. Daily intake and health risk index values of iron were ranged from 0.01 to 1.1 mg/kg/day and 0.02 to 1.05 mg/kg/day. There was a probable chance of upsurge in metal values in coming years due to continued mining activities. Anthropogenic input, mainly mining activities in the study area, have increased the Fe and Zn content in the environment which can ultimately find their way up the food chain, thereby risking the health of grazing livestock.

Indexed as

Metals, HeavySoil PollutantsAnimalsChinaEnvironmental MonitoringRisk AssessmentRuminantsSheepSoilMetals, HeavySoilSoil PollutantsBloodCoal minesForageIronSoilZinc

Identifiers

PMID34617216
OpenAlexW3202006028

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.