Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34617188›Full record

ArticleArchives of sexual behavior2021

Assessing Perceptions of Broad Consent Concerning Biological Specimen Collection in a Cohort of Young Sexual Minority Men.

Stephanie H Cook, Erica P Wood, Jessica Jaiswal, Robert Castro, Liz Calderon, Ying Qi, Amanda Llaneza

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Archives of sexual behavior, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Stephanie H CookDepartment of Biostatistics, School of Global Public Health, New York University, 715 Broadway, Room 1014, New York, NY, 10012, USA. sc5810@nyu.edu.ORCID 0000-0003-4505-0813
Erica P WoodDepartment of Biostatistics, School of Global Public Health, New York University, 715 Broadway, Room 1014, New York, NY, 10012, USA.
Jessica JaiswalRory Meyers School of Nursing, New York University, New York, NY, USA.
Robert CastroDepartment of Biostatistics, School of Global Public Health, New York University, 715 Broadway, Room 1014, New York, NY, 10012, USA.
Liz CalderonDepartment of Biostatistics, School of Global Public Health, New York University, 715 Broadway, Room 1014, New York, NY, 10012, USA.
Ying QiDepartment of Biostatistics, School of Global Public Health, New York University, 715 Broadway, Room 1014, New York, NY, 10012, USA.
Amanda LlanezaDepartment of Biostatistics, School of Global Public Health, New York University, 715 Broadway, Room 1014, New York, NY, 10012, USA.

Funding

Training Program in HIV Prevention Research EthicsR25DA031608 · NIDA · FORDHAM UNIVERSITY · PI FISHER, CELIA B · 2011 to 2025
$4.9M
NIDA NIH HHS 1R25DA031608,NIDA NIH HHS R25 DA031608
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The use of broad consent to store human biospecimens to be used in future research studies has increased over the years. However, it is currently unknown how young sexual minority men (YSMM) perceive broad consent in these specific types of studies. Therefore, in this study we aimed to determine the extent to which YSMM are comfortable with providing broad consent concerning their identifiable biological specimens to a variety of entities, including external researchers and pharmaceutical companies and to examine the relationship between mistrust based on racial/ethnic identity or sexual orientation and attitudes toward broad consent. YSMM (N = 239) ages 24-27 years were recruited from a prospective cohort study in New York City in 2018 to complete a survey assessing attitudes about the use of broad consent concerning biospecimens for secondary research. We found that YSMM were most willing to provide broad consent to the researcher from the study they were enrolled in (85.3%), other researchers within the same university (82.4%), and researchers at other universities (74.5%). Participants were least willing to provide broad consent to government organizations (64.4%) and pharmaceutical companies (53.8%). Further, we found that medical mistrust based on racial/ethnic identity or sexual orientation was associated with attitudes toward the use of broad consent. Research institutions should consider modifying consent procedures around the use of broad consent in order to maximize recruitment and retention, especially among minority populations.

Indexed as

Sexual and Gender MinoritiesTrustAdultCohort StudiesFemaleHumansInformed ConsentMalePerceptionProspective StudiesSpecimen HandlingYoung AdultBiologicsEthicsMistrustSexual orientationYoung sexual minority men

Identifiers

PMID34617188
PMCPMC8493942

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.