ArticleJVS-vascular science2020
Machine deep learning accurately detects endoleak after endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair.
Article in JVS-vascular science, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 43 citations in OpenAlex.
- Artificial Intelligence in Vascular Surgery: A Literature Review Focusing on Current Applications, Imaging Advances and Future Prospects.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Computer vision applications in vascular surgery: a systematic review and critical appraisal.NPJ digital medicine · 2026Article
- Progress in fully automated abdominal CT interpretation-an update over the past decade.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2026Review
- Artificial Intelligence in Vascular and Endovascular Surgery: From Prediction to Surgeon-Led Clinical Implementation.Annals of vascular diseases · 2026Review
- Review
- Current Applications and Future Perspectives of Artificial and Biomimetic Intelligence in Vascular Surgery and Peripheral Artery Disease.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Deep learning techniques for imaging diagnosis and treatment of aortic aneurysm.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2024Review
- Assessing the diagnostic accuracy of artificial intelligence in post-endovascular aneurysm repair endoleak detection using dual-energy computed tomography angiography.Polish journal of radiology · 2024Article
- Artificial Intelligence Application to Screen Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Using Computed tomography Angiography.Journal of digital imaging · 2023Article
- Artificial intelligence in clinical workflow processes in vascular surgery and beyond.Seminars in vascular surgery · 2023Review
- Automated Screening for Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm in CT Scans under Clinical Conditions Using Deep Learning.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Leveraging Machine Learning and Artificial Intelligence to Improve Peripheral Artery Disease Detection, Treatment, and Outcomes.Circulation research · 2021Review
- Great start predicts bright future forJVS-vascular science · 2021Article
- Machine learning for endoleak detection after endovascular aortic repair.Scientific reports · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThe objective of this study was to develop a machine deep learning algorithm for endoleak detection and measurement of aneurysm diameter, area, and volume from computed tomography angiography (CTA).
methodsDigital Imaging and Communications in Medicine files representing three-phase postoperative CTA images (N = 334) of 191 unique patients undergoing endovascular aneurysm repair for infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) with a variety of commercial devices were used to train a deep learning pipeline across four tasks. The RetinaNet object-detection convolutional neural network (CNN) architecture was trained to predict bounding boxes around the axial CTA slices that were then stitched together in two dimensions into a smaller region containing the aneurysm. Multiclass endoleak detection and segmentation of the AAA, endograft, and endoleak were performed on this smaller region. Segmentations on a single randomly selected contrast from each scan included 33 full and 68 partial segmentations for endograft and AAA and 99 full segmentations for endoleak. A modified version of ResNet-50 CNN was used to detect endoleak on individual axial slices. A three-dimensional U-Net CNN model was trained on the task of dense three-dimensional segmentation and used to measure diameter and volume with a specially designed loss function. We made use of fivefold cross-validation to evaluate model performance for each step, splitting training and testing data at each fold, such that multiple scans from the same patient were preserved with the same fold. Algorithm predictions for endoleak were compared with the radiology report and with a subset of CTA images independently read by two vascular specialists.
resultsThe localization portion of the network accurately predicted a region of interest containing the AAA in 99% of cases. The best model of binary endoleak detection obtained an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0
conclusionsThis machine learning algorithm shows promise in augmenting a human's ability to interpret postoperative CTA images and may help improve surveillance after endovascular aneurysm repair. External validation on larger data sets and prospective study are required before the algorithm can be clinically applicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.