Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34617024›Full record

ArticleRadiology. Artificial intelligence2021

Automated Segmentation and Volume Measurement of Intracranial Internal Carotid Artery Calcification at Noncontrast CT.

Gerda Bortsova, Daniel Bos, Florian Dubost, Meike W Vernooij, M Kamran Ikram, Gijs van Tulder, Marleen de Bruijne

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Radiology. Artificial intelligence, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.

Gerda BortsovaBiomedical Imaging Group Rotterdam, Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine (G.B., M.d.B.), Department of Epidemiology (D.B., M.W.V., M.K.I.), and Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine (M.W.V.), Erasmus MC, PO Box 2040, 3000 CA Rotterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Biomedical Data Science, Stanford University, Stanford, Calif (F.D.); Faculty of Science, Radboud University, Nijmegen, the Netherlands (G.v.T.); and Machine Learning Section, Department of Computer Science, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark (M.d.B.).ORCID 0000-0002-7614-8437
Daniel BosBiomedical Imaging Group Rotterdam, Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine (G.B., M.d.B.), Department of Epidemiology (D.B., M.W.V., M.K.I.), and Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine (M.W.V.), Erasmus MC, PO Box 2040, 3000 CA Rotterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Biomedical Data Science, Stanford University, Stanford, Calif (F.D.); Faculty of Science, Radboud University, Nijmegen, the Netherlands (G.v.T.); and Machine Learning Section, Department of Computer Science, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark (M.d.B.).ORCID 0000-0001-8979-2603
Florian DubostBiomedical Imaging Group Rotterdam, Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine (G.B., M.d.B.), Department of Epidemiology (D.B., M.W.V., M.K.I.), and Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine (M.W.V.), Erasmus MC, PO Box 2040, 3000 CA Rotterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Biomedical Data Science, Stanford University, Stanford, Calif (F.D.); Faculty of Science, Radboud University, Nijmegen, the Netherlands (G.v.T.); and Machine Learning Section, Department of Computer Science, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark (M.d.B.).
Meike W VernooijBiomedical Imaging Group Rotterdam, Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine (G.B., M.d.B.), Department of Epidemiology (D.B., M.W.V., M.K.I.), and Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine (M.W.V.), Erasmus MC, PO Box 2040, 3000 CA Rotterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Biomedical Data Science, Stanford University, Stanford, Calif (F.D.); Faculty of Science, Radboud University, Nijmegen, the Netherlands (G.v.T.); and Machine Learning Section, Department of Computer Science, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark (M.d.B.).ORCID 0000-0003-4658-2176
M Kamran IkramBiomedical Imaging Group Rotterdam, Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine (G.B., M.d.B.), Department of Epidemiology (D.B., M.W.V., M.K.I.), and Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine (M.W.V.), Erasmus MC, PO Box 2040, 3000 CA Rotterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Biomedical Data Science, Stanford University, Stanford, Calif (F.D.); Faculty of Science, Radboud University, Nijmegen, the Netherlands (G.v.T.); and Machine Learning Section, Department of Computer Science, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark (M.d.B.).
Gijs van TulderBiomedical Imaging Group Rotterdam, Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine (G.B., M.d.B.), Department of Epidemiology (D.B., M.W.V., M.K.I.), and Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine (M.W.V.), Erasmus MC, PO Box 2040, 3000 CA Rotterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Biomedical Data Science, Stanford University, Stanford, Calif (F.D.); Faculty of Science, Radboud University, Nijmegen, the Netherlands (G.v.T.); and Machine Learning Section, Department of Computer Science, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark (M.d.B.).ORCID 0000-0003-1635-5423
Marleen de BruijneBiomedical Imaging Group Rotterdam, Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine (G.B., M.d.B.), Department of Epidemiology (D.B., M.W.V., M.K.I.), and Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine (M.W.V.), Erasmus MC, PO Box 2040, 3000 CA Rotterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Biomedical Data Science, Stanford University, Stanford, Calif (F.D.); Faculty of Science, Radboud University, Nijmegen, the Netherlands (G.v.T.); and Machine Learning Section, Department of Computer Science, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark (M.d.B.).ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6328-902X
Radboud University Nijmegen · NLUniversity of Copenhagen · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo develop and evaluate a fully-automated deep learning-based method for assessment of intracranial internal carotid artery calcification (ICAC). MATERIALS AND

methodsThis was a secondary analysis of prospectively collected data from the Rotterdam study (2003-2006) to develop and validate a deep learning-based method for automated ICAC delineation and volume measurement. Two observers manually delineated ICAC on noncontrast CT scans of 2319 participants (mean age, 69 years ± 7 [standard deviation]; 1154 women [53.2%]), and a deep learning model was trained to segment ICAC and quantify its volume. Model performance was assessed by comparing manual and automated segmentations and volume measurements to those produced by an independent observer (available on 47 scans), comparing the segmentation accuracy in a blinded qualitative visual comparison by an expert observer, and comparing the association with first stroke incidence from the scan date until 2016. All method performance metrics were computed using 10-fold cross-validation.

resultsThe automated delineation of ICAC reached a sensitivity of 83.8% and positive predictive value (PPV) of 88%. The intraclass correlation between automatic and manual ICAC volume measures was 0.98 (95% CI: 0.97, 0.98; computed in the entire dataset). Measured between the assessments of independent observers, sensitivity was 73.9%, PPV was 89.5%, and intraclass correlation coefficient was 0.91 (95% CI: 0.84, 0.95; computed in the 47-scan subset). In the blinded visual comparisons of 294 regions, automated delineations were judged as more accurate than manual delineations in 131 regions, less accurate in 94 regions, and equally accurate in the rest of the regions (131 of 225, 58.2%;

conclusionThe developed model was capable of automated segmentation and volume quantification of ICAC with accuracy comparable to human experts.

Indexed as

ArteriosclerosisCalcifications/CalculiCarotid ArteriesCTNeural NetworksSegmentationStrokeVision Application Domain

Identifiers

PMID34617024
PMCPMC8489463
OpenAlexW3173719354

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.