ArticleERJ open research2021
Feasibility and clinical utility of ambulatory cough monitoring in an outpatient clinical setting: a real-world retrospective evaluation.
Article in ERJ open research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.
- Cough monitoring systems in adults with chronic respiratory diseases: a systematic review.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2025Pooled it
- Psychometric validation of the severity of chronic cough diary, leicester cough questionnaire, and a cough severity visual analogue scale in patients with refractory chronic cough.Journal of patient-reported outcomes · 2025Trial
- Top 10 priorities for chronic cough: Canadian James Lind Alliance Priority-Setting Partnership (CAN-COUGH).ERJ open research · 2025Article
- Patient-reported assessments of chronic cough in clinical trials: accessory or primary endpoints?Journal of thoracic disease · 2024Review
- Methods of Cough Assessment and Objectivization.Physiological research · 2023Review
- Article
- Present and future perspectives in early diagnosis and monitoring for progressive fibrosing interstitial lung diseases.Frontiers in medicine · 2023Article
- Chronic cough-the limitation and advances in assessment techniques.Journal of thoracic disease · 2022Review
- Performance of cough monitoring by Albus Home, a contactless and automated system for nocturnal respiratory monitoring at home.ERJ open research · 2022Article
- Residual Dyspnea May Predict Small Airways Dysfunction and Poor Responsiveness to Single-Inhaler Triple Therapy in Asthmatic Patients.Journal of asthma and allergy · 2022Article
- History Taking as a Diagnostic Tool in Children With Chronic Cough.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2022Review
- Assessing cough symptom severity in refractory or unexplained chronic cough: findings from patient focus groups and an international expert panel.ERJ open research · 2022Article
- Objective cough frequency monitoring in real-world practice.ERJ open research · 2021Article
- Patient and healthcare professional perspectives on telehealth in the care of interstitial lung disease.Chronic respiratory diseaseArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
research questionObjective quantification of cough is rarely utilised outside of research settings and the role of cough frequency monitoring in clinical practice has not been established. This study examined the clinical utility of cough frequency monitoring in an outpatient clinical setting.
methodsThe study involved a retrospective review of cough monitor data. Participants included 174 patients referred for treatment of cough and upper airway symptoms (103 chronic cough; 50 inducible laryngeal obstruction; 21 severe asthma) and 15 controls. Measures, taken prior to treatment, included 24-h ambulatory cough frequency using the Leicester Cough Monitor, the Leicester Cough Questionnaire and Laryngeal Hypersensitivity Questionnaire. Post-treatment data were available for 50 participants. Feasibility and clinical utility were also reported.
resultsAnalysis time per recording was up to 10 min. 75% of participants could use the monitors correctly, and most (93%) recordings were interpretable. The geometric mean cough frequency in patients was 10.1±2.9 (mean±sd) compared to 2.4±2.0 for healthy controls (p=0.003). There was no significant difference in cough frequency between clinical groups (p=0.080). Cough frequency decreased significantly following treatment (p<0.001). There was a moderate correlation between cough frequency and both cough quality of life and laryngeal hypersensitivity. Cough frequency monitoring was responsive to therapy and able to discriminate differences in cough frequency between diseases.
conclusionWhile ambulatory cough frequency monitoring remains a research tool, it provides useful clinical data that can assist in patient management. Logistical issues may preclude use in some clinical settings, and additional time needs to be allocated to the process.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.