Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34616839›Full record

ArticleERJ open research2021

Feasibility and clinical utility of ambulatory cough monitoring in an outpatient clinical setting: a real-world retrospective evaluation.

Anne E Vertigan, Sarah L Kapela, Surinder S Birring, Peter G Gibson

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ERJ open research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Cough monitoring systems in adults with chronic respiratory diseases: a systematic review.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Anne E VertiganSpeech Pathology, John Hunter Hospital, New Lambton Heights, NSW, Australia.
Sarah L KapelaSpeech Pathology, John Hunter Hospital, New Lambton Heights, NSW, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8889-5915
Surinder S BirringRespiratory Medicine, King's College Hospital, London, UK.
Peter G GibsonPriority Centre for Healthy Lungs, The University of Newcastle Hunter Medical Research Institute, New Lambton, NSW, Australia.
John Hunter Hospital · AUKing's College London · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

research questionObjective quantification of cough is rarely utilised outside of research settings and the role of cough frequency monitoring in clinical practice has not been established. This study examined the clinical utility of cough frequency monitoring in an outpatient clinical setting.

methodsThe study involved a retrospective review of cough monitor data. Participants included 174 patients referred for treatment of cough and upper airway symptoms (103 chronic cough; 50 inducible laryngeal obstruction; 21 severe asthma) and 15 controls. Measures, taken prior to treatment, included 24-h ambulatory cough frequency using the Leicester Cough Monitor, the Leicester Cough Questionnaire and Laryngeal Hypersensitivity Questionnaire. Post-treatment data were available for 50 participants. Feasibility and clinical utility were also reported.

resultsAnalysis time per recording was up to 10 min. 75% of participants could use the monitors correctly, and most (93%) recordings were interpretable. The geometric mean cough frequency in patients was 10.1±2.9 (mean±sd) compared to 2.4±2.0 for healthy controls (p=0.003). There was no significant difference in cough frequency between clinical groups (p=0.080). Cough frequency decreased significantly following treatment (p<0.001). There was a moderate correlation between cough frequency and both cough quality of life and laryngeal hypersensitivity. Cough frequency monitoring was responsive to therapy and able to discriminate differences in cough frequency between diseases.

conclusionWhile ambulatory cough frequency monitoring remains a research tool, it provides useful clinical data that can assist in patient management. Logistical issues may preclude use in some clinical settings, and additional time needs to be allocated to the process.

Identifiers

PMID34616839
PMCPMC8488350
OpenAlexW3193783514

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.