ArticleWorld journal of clinical cases2021
Hemorrhagic pericardial effusion following treatment with infliximab: A case report and literature review.
Article in World journal of clinical cases, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Rituximab therapy in pericarditis associated with rheumatoid arthritis.Rheumatology international · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundInfliximab (IFX) is an anti-tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α) agent that is widely used for the management of a variety of autoimmune and inflammatory diseases, including Crohn's disease (CD). As a result of its increasing administration, new complications have emerged. Hemorrhagic pericardial effusion, secondary to IFX therapy, is a rare but life-threatening complication. CASE SUMMARY: A 27-year-old man was diagnosed with CD (Montreal A2L3B1) 6 years prior. After failing to respond to mesalazine and methylprednisolone, he took the first dose of IFX 300 mg based on his weight (60 kg, dose 5 mg/kg) on December 3, 2018. He responded well to this therapy. However, on January 21, 2019, 1 wk after the third injection, he suddenly developed dyspnea, fever, and worsening weakness and was admitted to our hospital. On admission, computed tomography scan of the chest revealed a large pericardial effusion and a small right-side pleural effusion. An echocardiogram showed a large pericardial effusion and normal left ventricular function. Then successful ultrasound-guided pericardiocentesis was performed and 600 mL hemorrhagic fluid was drained. There was no evidence of infection and the concentrations of TNF-α, IFX, and anti-IFX antibody were 7.09 pg/mL (reference range < 8.1 pg/mL), < 0.4 μg/mL (> 1.0 μg/mL), and 373 ng/mL (< 30 ng/mL), respectively. As the IFX instruction manual for injection does mention pericardial effusion as a rare adverse reaction (≥ 1/10000, < 1/1000), so we discontinued the IFX. Monitoring of the patient's echocardiogram for 2 mo without IFX therapy showed no recurrence of hemorrhagic pericardial effusion. Follow-up visits and examinations every 3 to 6 mo until April 2021 showed no recurrence of CD or pericardial effusion.
conclusionThis is a case of hemorrhagic pericardial effusion following treatment with IFX. It is a rare but life-threatening complication of IFX. Early recognition helps prevent the occurrence of hemorrhagic pericardial effusion and minimize the impact on the natural evolution of the disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.