ReviewTherapeutic advances in musculoskeletal disease2021
Soluble biological markers in osteoarthritis.
Review in Therapeutic advances in musculoskeletal disease, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Associations between biomarkers and skeletal muscle function in individuals with osteoarthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Arthritis research & therapy · 2024Pooled it
- Trial
- Advances in heterogeneity and classification of osteoarthritis.Bone research · 2026Review
- Novel approaches to the stratified management of knee osteoarthritis.Nature reviews. Rheumatology · 2025Review
- Estimation of Serum C-terminal Cross-linked Telopeptide Type II Collagen (CTX II) Level to Diagnose Early Knee Osteoarthritis.Malaysian orthopaedic journal · 2025Article
- Collagen Hydrolysates as Nutritional Support in Canine Osteoarthritis: A Narrative Review.Journal of animal physiology and animal nutrition · 2025Review
- Branched-chain amino acids and specific phosphatidylinositols are plasma metabolite pairs associated with menstrual pain severity.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- (Chemical) Roles of HOCl in Rheumatic Diseases.Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Identification of plasma and urinary inflammatory markers in severe knee osteoarthritis: Relations with synovial fluid markers.Knee surgery & related research · 2024Article
- Effect of high in comparison to low dairy intake intervention on markers of bone and cartilage remodeling and phosphate metabolism in healthy adults with overweight.European journal of nutrition · 2024Article
- A comprehensive patient-specific prediction model for temporomandibular joint osteoarthritis progression.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024Article
- Effects of Etanercept and Adalimumab on Serum Levels of Cartilage Remodeling Markers in Women with Rheumatoid Arthritis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Article
- Cartilage-Related Collagens in Osteoarthritis and Rheumatoid Arthritis: From Pathogenesis to Therapeutics.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Review
- The protective effects of Olmesartan against interleukin-29 (IL-29)-induced type 2 collagen degradation in human chondrocytes.Bioengineered · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In recent years, markers research has focused on the structural components of cartilage matrix. Specifically, a second generation of degradation markers has been developed against type II collagen neoepitopes generated by specific enzymes. A particular effort has been made to measure the degradation of minor collagens III and X of the cartilage matrix. However, because clinical data, including longitudinal controlled studies, are very scarce, it remains unclear whether they will be useful as an alternative to or in combination with current more established collagen biological markers to assess patients with osteoarthritis (OA). In addition, new approaches using high-throughput technologies allowed to detect new types of markers and improve the knowledge about the metabolic changes linked to OA. The relative advances coming from phenotype research are a first attempt to classify the heterogeneity of OA, and several markers could improve the phenotype characterization. These phenotypes could improve the selection of patients in clinical trials limiting the size of the studies by selecting patients with OA characteristics corresponding to the metabolic pathway targeted by the molecules evaluated. In addition, the inclusion of rapid progressors only in clinical trials would facilitate the demonstration of efficacy of the investigative drug to reduce joint degradation. The combination of selective biochemical markers appears as a promising and cost-effective approach to fulfill this unmet clinical need. Among the various potential roles of biomarkers in OA, their ability to monitor drug efficacy is probably one of the most important, in association with clinical and imaging parameters. Biochemical markers have the unique property to detect changes in joint tissue metabolism within a few weeks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.