Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34616494›Full record

ReviewTherapeutic advances in musculoskeletal disease2021

Soluble biological markers in osteoarthritis.

Jean-Charles Rousseau, Roland Chapurlat, Patrick Garnero

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Therapeutic advances in musculoskeletal disease, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. (Chemical) Roles of HOCl in Rheumatic Diseases.Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. A comprehensive patient-specific prediction model for temporomandibular joint osteoarthritis progression.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jean-Charles RousseauINSERM Unit 1033, Pavillon F, Hôpital E. Herriot, 5 Place d'Arsonval, 69437 Lyon Cedex 03, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3755-2891
Roland ChapurlatBiochemical Marker Assay Laboratory for Clinical Research (PMO-Lab), Lyon, France.
Patrick GarneroBiochemical Marker Assay Laboratory for Clinical Research (PMO-Lab), Lyon, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In recent years, markers research has focused on the structural components of cartilage matrix. Specifically, a second generation of degradation markers has been developed against type II collagen neoepitopes generated by specific enzymes. A particular effort has been made to measure the degradation of minor collagens III and X of the cartilage matrix. However, because clinical data, including longitudinal controlled studies, are very scarce, it remains unclear whether they will be useful as an alternative to or in combination with current more established collagen biological markers to assess patients with osteoarthritis (OA). In addition, new approaches using high-throughput technologies allowed to detect new types of markers and improve the knowledge about the metabolic changes linked to OA. The relative advances coming from phenotype research are a first attempt to classify the heterogeneity of OA, and several markers could improve the phenotype characterization. These phenotypes could improve the selection of patients in clinical trials limiting the size of the studies by selecting patients with OA characteristics corresponding to the metabolic pathway targeted by the molecules evaluated. In addition, the inclusion of rapid progressors only in clinical trials would facilitate the demonstration of efficacy of the investigative drug to reduce joint degradation. The combination of selective biochemical markers appears as a promising and cost-effective approach to fulfill this unmet clinical need. Among the various potential roles of biomarkers in OA, their ability to monitor drug efficacy is probably one of the most important, in association with clinical and imaging parameters. Biochemical markers have the unique property to detect changes in joint tissue metabolism within a few weeks.

Indexed as

biomarkersdisease progressionmicro-RNAmolecular phenotypesosteoarthritissynovial fluidtreatment efficacytreatment response

Identifiers

PMID34616494
PMCPMC8488516

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.