Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34616477›Full record

ReviewEvidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM2021

Effect of Acupuncture on Polycystic Ovary Syndrome in Animal Models: A Systematic Review.

Yan Li, Lijia Zhang, Jinjin Gao, Jun Yan, Xue Feng, Xiting He, Hong Jin, Xinyu Li, Zhengyi Cui, Junfei Zhao and 5 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Effect of Acupuncture on Polycystic Ovary Syndrome in Animal Models: A Systematic Review.Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Yan LiFirst Affiliated Hospital, Heilongjiang University of Chinese Medicine, 26 Heping Road, Harbin 150040, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8915-9330
Lijia ZhangFirst Affiliated Hospital, Heilongjiang University of Chinese Medicine, 26 Heping Road, Harbin 150040, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5728-6586
Jinjin GaoFirst Affiliated Hospital, Heilongjiang University of Chinese Medicine, 26 Heping Road, Harbin 150040, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9931-607X
Jun YanFirst Affiliated Hospital, Heilongjiang University of Chinese Medicine, 26 Heping Road, Harbin 150040, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8527-6035
Xue FengHeilongjiang University of Chinese Medicine, 24 Heping Road, Harbin 150040, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7064-9479
Xiting HeHeilongjiang University of Chinese Medicine, 24 Heping Road, Harbin 150040, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1055-0079
Hong JinHeilongjiang University of Chinese Medicine, 24 Heping Road, Harbin 150040, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6053-6953
Xinyu LiHeilongjiang University of Chinese Medicine, 24 Heping Road, Harbin 150040, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4861-2423
Zhengyi CuiHeilongjiang University of Chinese Medicine, 24 Heping Road, Harbin 150040, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4005-7023
Junfei ZhaoHeilongjiang University of Chinese Medicine, 24 Heping Road, Harbin 150040, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8144-7095
Fengyi LiuHeilongjiang University of Chinese Medicine, 24 Heping Road, Harbin 150040, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1944-327X
Xiaowai LiuHeilongjiang University of Chinese Medicine, 24 Heping Road, Harbin 150040, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4489-4563
Yongfei LiuHeilongjiang University of Chinese Medicine, 24 Heping Road, Harbin 150040, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0588-424X
Wan RenHeilongjiang University of Chinese Medicine, 24 Heping Road, Harbin 150040, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1826-1562
Songjiang LiuFirst Affiliated Hospital, Heilongjiang University of Chinese Medicine, 26 Heping Road, Harbin 150040, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7031-6559
Heilongjiang University of Chinese Medicine · CNFirst Affiliated Hospital of Heilongjiang University of Chinese Medicine · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPolycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) is one of the most common endocrine disorders among women of reproductive age. As a widely used complementary and alternative therapy, acupuncture is increasingly used to treat PCOS. However, the effect of acupuncture in treating PCOS is uncertain, and the mechanisms are unclear. This systematic review aims to determine the efficacy of acupuncture on PCOS in animal preclinical models.

methodsExperimental animal studies of acupuncture in PCOS animal models were searched in PubMed, Web of Science, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, and the Chinese Science and Technology Periodical Database from inception to December 2020. The risk of bias was assessed using the Systematic Review Centre for Laboratory Animal Experimentation (SYRCLE) risk of bias tool.

resultsA total of 358 studies were screened based on the title and abstract, and 31 studies were included. A total of 722 animals were involved, and all studies used either Wistar rats or SD rats. Twenty-six studies used electroacupuncture, 9 studies used manual acupuncture, and 5 of them employed both electroacupuncture and manual acupuncture. A total of 22 acupoints were involved; 7 studies followed the modern acupuncture pattern, and the rest followed classic acupuncture theory.

conclusionsThe present review summarizes the current evidence of the effects of acupuncture on PCOS in animal models. Unfortunately, we could not draw a definite conclusion due to the methodological weakness of the included studies and the high heterogeneity. Well-designed studies are needed in the future to fill this gap.

Identifiers

PMID34616477
PMCPMC8487835
OpenAlexW3203450194

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.