Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34616225›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical biochemistry2021

Comparative study of chemical pathology sample collection tubes at the largest hospital in South Africa.

Siyabonga P Khoza, Sarah Ford, Ernest P Buthelezi, Donald M Tanyanyiwa

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical biochemistry, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 96% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Siyabonga P KhozaUniversity of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.
Sarah FordNational Health Laboratory Service, Department of Chemical Pathology, Johannesburg, South Africa.
Ernest P ButheleziGauteng Department of Health, Johannesburg, South Africa.
Donald M TanyanyiwaSefako Makgatho University of Health Sciences, Pretoria, South Africa.
University of the Witwatersrand · ZANational Health Laboratory Service · ZA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBarricor

methodsForty-four paired samples were collected using both Barricor

resultsAll analytes were comparable at baseline. Statistical differences (p<0.001) became evident after 24 h. PO4, K, and creatinine had a mean difference that exceeded the desirable specification for bias (-9.59%, - 9.35%, and -4.59%, respectively). Potassium was stable up to 24 h in both tubes. LDH showed better stability in SST (144 h vs 96 h). PO4 concentrations were more stable in both tubes with the SST (96 h vs 72 h). Creatinine and AST had the longest stability in both tubes compared to other analytes (144 h).

conclusionsData demonstrated variability and similarities in analyte concentrations and stability, respectively, in both tubes.

Indexed as

BarricorTMblood collection devicesserum separator tubes

Identifiers

PMID34616225
PMCPMC8451222
OpenAlexW3149440042

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.