Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34616073›Full record

ArticleNature2021

Isoform cell-type specificity in the mouse primary motor cortex.

A Sina Booeshaghi, Zizhen Yao, Cindy van Velthoven, Kimberly Smith, Bosiljka Tasic, Hongkui Zeng, Lior Pachter

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 62 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
62citing papers in PubMed
6.2field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

62 citing papers in PubMed, 91 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

2 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

A Sina BooeshaghiDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6442-4502
Zizhen YaoAllen Institute for Brain Science, Seattle, WA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9361-5607
Cindy van VelthovenAllen Institute for Brain Science, Seattle, WA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5120-4546
Kimberly SmithAllen Institute for Brain Science, Seattle, WA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3142-1970
Bosiljka TasicAllen Institute for Brain Science, Seattle, WA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6861-4506
Hongkui ZengAllen Institute for Brain Science, Seattle, WA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0326-5878
Lior PachterDivision of Biology and Biological Engineering, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA, USA. lpachter@caltech.edu.
Allen Institute for Brain Science · USCalifornia Institute of Technology · US

Funding

Generation of novel cell type specific mouse genetic toolsU19MH114830 · NIMH · ALLEN INSTITUTE · PI ANDERSON, DAVID J, PACHTER, LIOR S · 2017 to 2021
$64.7M
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Full-length SMART-seq

Indexed as

Gene Expression ProfilingIn Situ Hybridization, FluorescenceSingle-Cell AnalysisTranscriptomeAnimalsAtlases as TopicFemaleGABAergic NeuronsGlutamatesMaleMiceMice, Inbred C57BLMotor CortexNeuronsOrgan SpecificitySequence AnalysisGlutamates

Identifiers

PMID34616073
PMCPMC8494650
OpenAlexW3204119535

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.