Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34615914›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2021

Neurocognitive development of novelty and error monitoring in children and adolescents.

Kathleen Kang, Nina Alexander, Jan R Wessel, Pauline Wimberger, Katharina Nitzsche, Clemens Kirschbaum, Shu-Chen Li

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 50% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Exploring the role of post-error processing in social anxiety across age.Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, and allied disciplines · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Kathleen KangFaculty of Psychology, Chair of Lifespan Developmental Neuroscience, Technische Universität Dresden, Zellescher Weg 17, BZW A232/233, 01069, Dresden, Germany. kathleen_yen_li.kang@tu-dresden.de.
Nina AlexanderDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Phillips University Marburg, Marburg, Germany.
Jan R WesselDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences and Department of Neurology, University of Iowa, Iowa City, USA.
Pauline WimbergerDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Faculty of Medicine, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
Katharina NitzscheDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Faculty of Medicine, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
Clemens KirschbaumFaculty of Psychology, Chair of Biological Psychology, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
Shu-Chen LiFaculty of Psychology, Chair of Lifespan Developmental Neuroscience, Technische Universität Dresden, Zellescher Weg 17, BZW A232/233, 01069, Dresden, Germany. shu-chen.li@tu-dresden.de.
TU Dresden · DEPhilipps University of Marburg · DEUniversity of Iowa · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The abilities to monitor one's actions and novel information in the environment are crucial for behavioural and cognitive control. This study investigated the development of error and novelty monitoring and their electrophysiological correlates by using a combined flanker with novelty-oddball task in children (7-12 years) and adolescents (14-18 years). Potential moderating influences of prenatal perturbation of steroid hormones on these performance monitoring processes were explored by comparing individuals who were prenatally exposed and who were not prenatally exposed to synthetic glucocorticoids (sGC). Generally, adolescents performed more accurately and faster than children. However, behavioural adaptations to error or novelty, as reflected in post-error or post-novelty slowing, showed different developmental patterns. Whereas post-novelty slowing could be observed in children and adolescents, error-related slowing was absent in children and was marginally significant in adolescents. Furthermore, the amplitude of error-related negativity was larger in adolescents, whereas the amplitude of novelty-related N2 was larger in children. These age differences suggest that processes involving top-down processing of task-relevant information (for instance, error monitoring) mature later than processes implicating bottom-up processing of salient novel stimuli (for instance, novelty monitoring). Prenatal exposure to sGC did not directly affect performance monitoring but initial findings suggest that it might alter brain-behaviour relation, especially for novelty monitoring.

Indexed as

Adolescent DevelopmentChild DevelopmentCognitionAdolescentBrainChildEvoked PotentialsFemaleHumansMalePsychomotor PerformanceReaction Time

Identifiers

PMID34615914
PMCPMC8494897
OpenAlexW3203009700

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.