ReviewNature communications2021
A proteomics sample metadata representation for multiomics integration and big data analysis.
Review in Nature communications, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 74 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
74 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Meta-Analysis of Rice Phosphoproteomics Data to Understand Variation in Cell Signaling Across the Rice Pan-Genome.Journal of proteome research · 2024Pooled it
- Initial recommendations for performing, benchmarking and reporting single-cell proteomics experiments.Nature methods · 2023Guideline
- Standardized Annotation of Quantitative Proteomics Datasets Using SDRF-Proteomics.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2027Article
- Reviving Data Potential─The Reanalysis-Driven Metabolomics Data Repository MB-POST.Analytical chemistry · 2026Article
- Agentic AI-Assisted Coding Offers a Unique Opportunity to Instill Epistemic Grounding during Software Development.Journal of proteome research · 2026Article
- Temporal and Functional Profiling of the Microbiome of High and Low Nitrogen Content Barley Seed in Silo Storage.Food science & nutrition · 2026Article
- FRED enables standardized FAIR metadata generation and management for omics research.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- The need for standardization and improved open (meta)data practices in metaproteomics.Microbiome · 2026Article
- Article
- Rapid Histone Post-Translational Modification Analysis Using Alternative Proteases and Tandem Mass Tags.Analytical chemistry · 2026Article
- pmultiqc: An Open-Source, Lightweight, and Metadata-Oriented QC Reporting Library for MS Proteomics.Molecular & cellular proteomics : MCP · 2026Article
- Rapid Histone Post-Translational Modification Analysis Using Alternative Proteases and Tandem Mass Tags.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Review
- Semantic annotation of Glycomics and Glycoproteomics methods.Glycobiology · 2026Article
- Blood proteomics: insights from public data.Genome biology · 2026Review
- Semantic alignment of the German Human Genome-Phenome Archive metadata model in Europe's genomics field.Scientific data · 2026Article
- Unlocking the Next Decade of Proteomics with Standardized, Structured Metadata.Journal of proteome research · 2026Review
- TheJournal of proteome research · 2026Article
- BioSamples database: the global hub for sample metadata and multi-omics integration.Nucleic acids research · 2026Article
- EMBL's European Bioinformatics Institute (EMBL-EBI) in 2025.Nucleic acids research · 2026Review
14 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
40 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The amount of public proteomics data is rapidly increasing but there is no standardized format to describe the sample metadata and their relationship with the dataset files in a way that fully supports their understanding or reanalysis. Here we propose to develop the transcriptomics data format MAGE-TAB into a standard representation for proteomics sample metadata. We implement MAGE-TAB-Proteomics in a crowdsourcing project to manually curate over 200 public datasets. We also describe tools and libraries to validate and submit sample metadata-related information to the PRIDE repository. We expect that these developments will improve the reproducibility and facilitate the reanalysis and integration of public proteomics datasets.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.