Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34615721›Full record

ArticleClinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research2022

Adjuvant Imatinib in Patients with GIST Harboring Exon 9 KIT Mutations: Results from a Multi-institutional European Retrospective Study.

Bruno Vincenzi, Andrea Napolitano, Marta Fiocco, Olivier Mir, Piotr Rutkowski, Jean-Yves Blay, Peter Reichardt, Heikki Joensuu, Elena Fumagalli, Spyridon Gennatas and 27 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. SEOM-GEIS clinical guideline for gastrointestinal stromal tumors (2022).Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2023
    Guideline
  3. KIT and PDGFRA Mutations and Survival of Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor Patients Treated with Adjuvant Imatinib in a Randomized Trial.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2023
    Trial
  4. Updated Asian consensus guidelines for the diagnosis and management of gastrointestinal stromal tumor (2025).Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association · 2026
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Cancers · 2023
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Current status of and future prospects for the treatment of unresectable or metastatic gastrointestinal stromal tumours.Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association · 2023
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. 2023 GEIS Guidelines for gastrointestinal stromal tumors.Therapeutic advances in medical oncology · 2023
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

37 authors.

Bruno Vincenzi *Medical Oncology, Università Campus Bio-Medico, Rome, Italy.
Andrea Napolitano *Medical Oncology, Università Campus Bio-Medico, Rome, Italy.
Marta FioccoBiomedical Statistics and Data Science, Mathematical Institute Leiden University, Leiden, the Netherlands.
Olivier MirSarcoma Group, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France.ORCID 0000-0002-6761-4002
Piotr RutkowskiDepartment of Bone/Soft Tissue Sarcoma and Melanoma, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Warsaw, Poland.
Jean-Yves BlayMedical Oncology, Center Léon Bérard, Lyon, France.ORCID 0000-0001-7190-120X
Peter ReichardtHELIOS Clinic Berlin Buch, Berlin, Germany.
Heikki JoensuuOncology, Helsinki University Central Hospital and University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.ORCID 0000-0003-0281-2507
Elena FumagalliMedical Oncology Unit 2, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori di Milano, Milan, Italy.
Spyridon GennatasSarcoma Unit, Royal Marsden Hospital NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-5635-7696
Nadia HindiBiomedicine Institute of Seville/Virgen del Rocío University Hospital, Sevilla, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-5864-762X
Margherita NanniniDIMES, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-2103-1960
Mariella Spalato CerusoSarcoma Unit, Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux, France.ORCID 0000-0002-7582-3365
Antoine ItalianoSarcoma Unit, Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux, France.
Giovanni GrignaniMedical Oncology, Candiolo Cancer Institute FPO-IRCCS, Candiolo, Italy.
Antonella BrunelloDivision of Medical Oncology, Istituto Oncologico Veneto- IRCCS, Padova, Italy.
Silvia GasperoniTranslational Oncology Unit, University Hospital Careggi, Firenze, Italy.
Tommaso De PasMedical Oncology for Melanoma & Sarcoma, IEO - European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-5684-5254
Giuseppe BadalamentiMedical Oncology, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy.
Maria A PantaleoDIMES, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Winan J van HoudtSurgical Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Nikki S IJzermanDepartment of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-7473-6606
Neeltje SteeghsMedical Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Hans GelderblomMedical Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-9270-8636
Ingrid M E DesarMedical Oncology, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
Johanna FalkenhorstMedical Oncology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-4738-7121
Marianna SillettaMedical Oncology, Università Campus Bio-Medico, Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-6189-0578
Marta SbaragliaPathological Anatomy, Azienda Ospedaliera di Padova, Padua, Italy.
Giuseppe ToniniMedical Oncology, Università Campus Bio-Medico, Rome, Italy.
Javier Martin-BrotoBiomedicine Institute of Seville/Virgen del Rocío University Hospital, Sevilla, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-7350-6916
Peter HohenbergerDivision of Surgical Oncology and Thoracic Surgery, University Medical Center Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany.
Axel Le CesneSarcoma Group, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France.
Robin L JonesSarcoma Unit, Royal Marsden Hospital NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-4173-3844
Angelo P Dei TosPathological Anatomy, Azienda Ospedaliera di Padova, Padua, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-1228-8940
Alessandro GronchiSurgery, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori di Milano, Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-4703-3534
Sebastian BauerMedical Oncology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-5949-8120
Paolo G CasaliMedical Oncology Unit 2, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori di Milano, Milan, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe effect of high-dose imatinib (800 mg/day) on survival in the adjuvant treatment of patients with resected KIT exon 9-mutated gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST) is not established. Here, the association of dose and other clinicopathologic variables with survival was evaluated in a large multi-institutional European cohort. EXPERIMENTAL

designData from 185 patients were retrospectively collected in 23 European GIST reference centers. Propensity score matching (PSM) and inverse-probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) were used to account for confounders. Univariate and multivariate unweighted and weighted Cox proportional hazard regression models were estimated for relapse-free survival (RFS), modified-RFS (mRFS) and imatinib failure-free survival (IFFS). Univariate Cox models were estimated for overall survival.

resultsOf the 185 patients, 131 (70.8%) received a starting dose of 400 mg/d and the remaining 54 (29.2%) a dose of 800 mg/d. Baseline characteristics were partially unbalanced, suggesting a potential selection bias. PSM and IPTW analyses showed no advantage of imatinib 800 mg/d. In the weighted multivariate Cox models, high-dose imatinib was not associated with the survival outcomes [RFS: hazard ratio (HR), 1.24; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.79-1.94; mRFS: HR, 1.69; 95% CI, 0.92-3.10; IFFS: HR, 1.35; 95% CI, 0.79-2.28]. The variables consistently associated with worse survival outcomes were high mitotic index and nongastric tumor location.

conclusionsIn this retrospective series of patients with KIT exon 9-mutated GIST treated with adjuvant imatinib, a daily dose of 800 mg versus 400 mg did not show better results in terms of survival outcomes. Prospective evaluation of the more appropriate adjuvant treatment in this setting is warranted.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsGastrointestinal Stromal TumorsAdjuvants, ImmunologicChemotherapy, AdjuvantExonsHumansImatinib MesylateMutationNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalProto-Oncogene Proteins c-kitRetrospective StudiesAdjuvants, ImmunologicAntineoplastic AgentsImatinib MesylateProto-Oncogene Proteins c-kit

Identifiers

PMID34615721
PMCPMC9365355

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.