Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34615501›Full record

ArticleBMC psychiatry2021

Resilience, coping, and distress among healthcare service personnel during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Timothy R Elliott, Paul B Perrin, Anne-Stuart Bell, Mark B Powers, Ann Marie Warren

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC psychiatry, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
5.0field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Differential impact of COVID-19 on mental health and burnout.Occupational medicine (Oxford, England) · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Predictors of Vaccine Hesitancy among Health Care Workers during the COVID-19 Pandemic.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Timothy R ElliottDepartment of Educational Psychology, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, 77843-4225, USA. telliott@tamu.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-6608-7714
Paul B PerrinDepartment of Psychology, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2070-215X
Anne-Stuart BellDepartment of Educational Psychology, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, 77843-4225, USA.
Mark B PowersBaylor University Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7898-073X
Ann Marie WarrenBaylor Scott & White Research Institute, Baylor University Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3753-5573
Baylor University Medical Center · USTexas A&M University · USVirginia Commonwealth University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe COVID-19 pandemic has a detrimental effect on the health and well-being of health care workers (HCWs). The extent to which HCWs may differ in their experience of depression and anxiety is unclear, and longitudinal studies are lacking. The present study examined theorized differences in distress between resilient and non-resilient HCWs over time, as reported in a national online survey. We also examined possible differences in distress as a function of sex and doctoral-level status.

methodsA national sample responded to an online survey data that included the study measures. Of the HCWs who responded, 666 had useable data at the two time points. A longitudinal structural equation model tested an a priori model that specified the relationship of a resilient personality prototype to self-reported resilience, coping, depression and anxiety at both measurement occasions. Additional invariance models examined possible differences by sex and doctoral-level status.

resultsThe final model explained 46.4% of the variance in psychological distress at Time 1 and 69.1% at Time 2. A non-resilient personality prototype predicted greater depression and anxiety. A resilient personality prototype was predictive of and operated through self-reported resilience and less disengaged coping to effect lower distress. No effects were found for active coping, however. The final model was generally invariant by sex and HCWs status. Additional analyses revealed that non-doctoral level HCWs had significantly higher depression and anxiety than doctoral-level HCWs on both occasions.

conclusionsHCWs differ in their susceptibility to distress imposed by COVID-19. Those who are particularly vulnerable may have characteristics that contribute to a lower sense of confidence and efficacy in stressful situations, and more likely to rely on ineffective, disengaged coping behaviors that can exacerbate stress levels. Individual interventions and institutional policies may be implemented to support HCWs at risk.

Indexed as

COVID-19PandemicsAdaptation, PsychologicalDelivery of Health CareHumansSARS-CoV-2Stress, PsychologicalAnxietyCopingCOVID-19DepressionHealthcare workersResilience

Identifiers

PMID34615501
PMCPMC8493044
OpenAlexW3203579590

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.