ArticleOptics express2021
2.5D microscopy with polarization independent SLM for enhanced detection efficiency and aberration correction.
Article in Optics express, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Multiplane 2.5D microscopy for high-throughput high-resolution tissue imaging.Journal of biomedical optics · 2025Article
- Highly sensitive volumetric single-molecule imaging.Nanophotonics (Berlin, Germany) · 2024Article
- Multicolor two-photon light-patterning microscope exploiting the spatio-temporal properties of a fiber bundle.Biomedical optics express · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Fast, volumetric imaging by fluorescence microscopy is essential in studying biological phenomena and cellular functions. Recently, single-shot 2.5D microscopy showed promising results for high-throughput quantitative subcellular analysis via extended depth of field imaging without sequential z-scanning; however, the detection efficiency was limited and it lacked depth-induced aberration correction. Here we report that a spatial light modulator (SLM) in a polarization insensitive configuration can significantly improve the detection efficiency of 2.5D microscopy, while also compensating for aberrations at large imaging depths caused by the refractive index mismatch between the sample and the immersion medium. We highlight the improved efficiency via quantitative single-molecule RNA imaging of mammalian cells with a 2-fold improvement in the fluorescence intensity compared to a conventional SLM-based microscopy. We demonstrate the aberration correction capabilities and extended depth of field by imaging thick specimens with fewer z-scanning steps.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.