Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34614551›Full record

ArticleChronic obstructive pulmonary diseases (Miami, Fla.)2021

Use of the Evaluating Respiratory Symptoms™ in COPD as an Outcome Measure in Clinical Trials: A Rapid Systematic Review.

Donald M Bushnell, Rozanne Wilson, Florian S Gutzwiller, Nancy K Leidy, Carolina Hache, Chau Thach, Claus F Vogelmeier

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Chronic obstructive pulmonary diseases (Miami, Fla.), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Interpreting Evaluating Respiratory SymptomsChronic obstructive pulmonary diseases (Miami, Fla.) · 2022
    Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Donald M BushnellEvidera, Seattle, Washington, United States.
Rozanne WilsonEvidera, Seattle, Washington, United States.
Florian S GutzwillerNovartis Pharma AG, Basel, Switzerland.
Nancy K LeidyEvidera, Seattle, Washington, United States.
Carolina HacheNovartis Pharma AG, Basel, Switzerland.
Chau ThachNovartis Pharma AG, Basel, Switzerland.
Claus F VogelmeierPulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, University Medical Centre Giessen and Marburg, Philipps-Universität Marburg, Germany and Member of the German Centre for Lung Research (DZL), Marburg, Germany.
Ithaka Harbors · USNovartis (Switzerland) · CH

Funding

Novartis
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

rationalePatients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) struggle with respiratory symptoms that impair their daily activities and quality of life. Understanding a treatment's ability to relieve symptoms requires precise assessment. The Evaluating Respiratory Symptoms in COPD (E-RS

objectivesTo summarize the use of the E-RS:COPD in pharmacological trials since its qualification by regulatory authorities.

methodsA rapid systematic literature review, using key biomedical databases to identify English language full-text publications of randomized controlled clinical trials (RCTs) that included the E-RS:COPD as an endpoint (2010-2020). Two investigators independently screened the publications and extracted data. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN

resultsOf 219 screened records, 28 full-text publications were included, and data from 17 reporting 20 unique double-blind RCTs were synthesized. The E-RS:COPD was positioned as a primary or secondary endpoint in six publications (35%), and served as an exploratory or additional endpoint in 11 (65%). Statistically significant E-RS:COPD treatment effects versus placebo/comparator were found in 13 of the 14 publications reporting symptom results. E-RS:COPD effects corresponded well with other outcome measures (e.g., St George's Respiratory Questionnaire [SGRQ] and forced expiratory volume 1 second [FEV

conclusionsE-RS:COPD is sensitive to treatment effects in clinical trials testing drug therapies. Presentation of trial results should include responder analyses to facilitate interpretation and application of results.

Indexed as

patient-reported outcome measuresensitivity and specificitysystematic literature reviewtreatment outcome

Identifiers

PMID34614551
PMCPMC8686855
OpenAlexW3202983809

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.