Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34614190›Full record

ArticleNucleic acids research2021

Non-canonical LexA proteins regulate the SOS response in the Bacteroidetes.

Miquel Sánchez-Osuna, Pilar Cortés, Mark Lee, Aaron T Smith, Jordi Barbé, Ivan Erill

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nucleic acids research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Bacterial PprI-DdrO system evolved from ImmA-ImmR system in the prophage.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. The DNA damage response ofProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  11. Repression ofJournal of bacteriology · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Molecular characterization ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2023
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Sending out an SOS - the bacterial DNA damage response.Genetics and molecular biology · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Miquel Sánchez-OsunaDepartament de Genètica i de Microbiologia, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, 08192 Bellaterra, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-5267-4814
Pilar CortésDepartament de Genètica i de Microbiologia, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, 08192 Bellaterra, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-5924-0653
Mark LeeDepartment of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of Maryland Baltimore County, Baltimore, MD 21250, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0660-7359
Aaron T SmithDepartment of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of Maryland Baltimore County, Baltimore, MD 21250, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9332-8683
Jordi BarbéDepartament de Genètica i de Microbiologia, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, 08192 Bellaterra, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-4408-013X
Ivan ErillDepartament de Genètica i de Microbiologia, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, 08192 Bellaterra, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-7280-7191
Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona · ESUniversity of Maryland, Baltimore County · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Lesions to DNA compromise chromosome integrity, posing a direct threat to cell survival. The bacterial SOS response is a widespread transcriptional regulatory mechanism to address DNA damage. This response is coordinated by the LexA transcriptional repressor, which controls genes involved in DNA repair, mutagenesis and cell-cycle control. To date, the SOS response has been characterized in most major bacterial groups, with the notable exception of the Bacteroidetes. No LexA homologs had been identified in this large, diverse and ecologically important phylum, suggesting that it lacked an inducible mechanism to address DNA damage. Here, we report the identification of a novel family of transcriptional repressors in the Bacteroidetes that orchestrate a canonical response to DNA damage in this phylum. These proteins belong to the S24 peptidase family, but are structurally different from LexA. Their N-terminal domain is most closely related to CI-type bacteriophage repressors, suggesting that they may have originated from phage lytic phase repressors. Given their role as SOS regulators, however, we propose to designate them as non-canonical LexA proteins. The identification of a new class of repressors orchestrating the SOS response illuminates long-standing questions regarding the origin and plasticity of this transcriptional network.

Indexed as

Genome, BacterialSOS Response, GeneticsBacterial ProteinsBacteriophagesBacteroidetesBinding SitesDNA, BacterialDNA DamageDNA RepairEscherichia coliGene Expression Regulation, BacterialGene Regulatory NetworksLexA Repressor ProteinModels, MolecularPeptide HydrolasesProtein BindingBacterial ProteinsDNA, BacterialLexA Repressor ProteinPeptide HydrolasesRepressor ProteinsSerine Endopeptidases

Identifiers

PMID34614190
PMCPMC8565304
OpenAlexW3204580680

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.