Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34613994›Full record

ArticlePloS one2021

Beyond words: From jaguar population trends to conservation and public policy in Mexico.

Gerardo Ceballos, Heliot Zarza, José F González-Maya, J Antonio de la Torre, Andrés Arias-Alzate, Carlos Alcerreca, Horacio V Barcenas, Gerardo Carreón-Arroyo, Cuauhtémoc Chávez, Carlos Cruz and 10 more

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors.

Gerardo CeballosLaboratorio de Ecología y Conservación de Fauna Silvestre, Instituto de Ecología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Ciudad Universitaria, Coyoacán, Ciudad de México, México.ORCID 0000-0001-8374-2656
Heliot ZarzaDepartamento de Ciencias Ambientales, Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana, Unidad Lerma, CBS, Lerma de Villada, México.
José F González-MayaLaboratorio de Ecología y Conservación de Fauna Silvestre, Instituto de Ecología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Ciudad Universitaria, Coyoacán, Ciudad de México, México.
J Antonio de la TorreLaboratorio de Ecología y Conservación de Vertebrados Terrestres, Instituto de Ecología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Ciudad Universitaria, Ciudad de México, México.
Andrés Arias-AlzateUniversidad CES, Facultad de Ciencias y Biotecnología, Medellín, Antioquia, Colombia.
Carlos AlcerrecaBiocenosis, Mérida, Yucatán, México.
Horacio V BarcenasFacultad de Ciencias, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Ciudad Universitaria, Ciudad de México, México.
Gerardo Carreón-ArroyoNaturalia A.C., Hermosillo, Sonora, México.
Cuauhtémoc ChávezDepartamento de Ciencias Ambientales, Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana, Unidad Lerma, CBS, Lerma de Villada, México.
Carlos CruzLaboratorio de Ecología y Conservación de Fauna Silvestre, Instituto de Ecología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Ciudad Universitaria, Coyoacán, Ciudad de México, México.
Daniela MedellínLaboratorio de Ecología y Conservación de Fauna Silvestre, Instituto de Ecología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Ciudad Universitaria, Coyoacán, Ciudad de México, México.
Andres GarcíaEstación de Biología Chamela, Instituto de Biología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, San Patricio-Melaque, La Huerta, Jalisco, México.
Marco Antonio-GarcíaFacultad de Ciencias Políticas y Sociales, Universidad Autónoma de Querétaro, Querétaro, México.
Marco A Lazcano-BarreroReserva Ecológica El Edén A.C., Cancún, Quintana Roo, México.
Rodrigo A MedellínProyecto de Conservación de Aguas y Tierras, ProCAT Colombia/Costa Rica, Bogotá, Colombia.
Oscar Moctezuma-OrozcoNaturalia A.C., Col. Ampliación Nápoles, Benito Juárez, Ciudad de México, México.
Fernando RuizCentro de Investigaciones Biológicas, Instituto de Ciencias Básicas e Ingeniería, Universidad Autónoma del Estado de Hidalgo, Ciudad del Conocimiento, Col. Carboneras, Mineral de la Reforma, Hidalgo, México.
Yamel RubioFacultad de Biología, Universidad Autónoma de Sinaloa, Ciudad Universitaria, Culiacán, Sinaloa, México.
Victor H LujaUnidad Academica de Turismo, Universidad Autonoma de Nayarit, Ciudad de la Cultura, Tepic, Nayarit.
Erik Joaquín Torres-RomeroLaboratorio de Ecología y Conservación de Fauna Silvestre, Instituto de Ecología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Ciudad Universitaria, Coyoacán, Ciudad de México, México.ORCID 0000-0002-1078-9223

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The jaguar (Panthera onca) is one of the most threatened carnivores in the Americas. Despite a long history of research on this charismatic species, to date there have been few systematic efforts to assess its population size and status in most countries across its distribution range. We present here the results of the two National Jaguar Surveys for Mexico, the first national censuses in any country within the species distribution. We estimated jaguar densities from field data collected at 13 localities in 2008-2010 (2010 hereafter) and 11 localities in 2016-2018 (2018 hereafter). We used the 2010 census results as the basis to develop a National Jaguar Conservation Strategy that identified critical issues for jaguar conservation in Mexico. We worked with the Mexican government to implement the conservation strategy and then evaluated its effectivity. To compare the 2010 and 2018 results, we estimated the amount of jaguar-suitable habitat in the entire country based on an ecological niche model for both periods. Suitable jaguar habitat covered ~267,063 km2 (13.9% of the country's territory) in 2010 and ~ 288,890 km2 (~14.8% of the country's territory) in 2018. Using the most conservative density values for each priority region, we estimated jaguar densities for both the high and low suitable habitats. The total jaguar population was estimated in ~4,000 individuals for 2010 census and ~4,800 for the 2018 census. The Yucatan Peninsula was the region with the largest population, around 2000 jaguars, in both censuses. Our promising results indicate that the actions we proposed in the National Jaguar Conservation Strategy, some of which have been implemented working together with the Federal Government, other NGO's, and land owners, are improving jaguar conservation in Mexico. The continuation of surveys and monitoring programs of the jaguar populations in Mexico will provide accurate information to design and implement effective, science-based conservation measures to try to ensure that robust jaguar populations remain a permanent fixture of Mexico's natural heritage.

Indexed as

AnimalsConservation of Natural ResourcesEcosystemMexicoPantheraPopulation DensityPublic Policy

Identifiers

PMID34613994
PMCPMC8494370

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.