Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34613881›Full record

ArticleHuman vaccines & immunotherapeutics2022

How has COVID-19 pandemic changed flu vaccination attitudes among an Italian cancer center healthcare workers?

Lucia Bertoni, Andrea Roncadori, Nicola Gentili, Valentina Danesi, Ilaria Massa, Oriana Nanni, Mattia Altini, Giovanni Gabutti, Maria Teresa Montella

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. COVID-19 and Influenza Vaccination Campaign in a Research and University Hospital in Milan, Italy.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Lucia BertoniHealthcare Administration, IRCCS-Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori "Dino Amadori"- Irst, Meldola, Italy.
Andrea RoncadoriOutcome Research, Healthcare Administration, IRCCS-Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori "Dino Amadori"- Irst, Meldola, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-0356-9273
Nicola GentiliOutcome Research, Healthcare Administration, IRCCS-Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori "Dino Amadori"- Irst, Meldola, Italy.
Valentina DanesiOutcome Research, Healthcare Administration, IRCCS-Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori "Dino Amadori"- Irst, Meldola, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-9261-6467
Ilaria MassaOutcome Research, Healthcare Administration, IRCCS-Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori "Dino Amadori"- Irst, Meldola, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-1388-3175
Oriana NanniUnit of Biostatistics and Clinical Trials, IRCCS-Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori "Dino Amadori"- Irst, Meldola, Italy.
Mattia AltiniHealthcare Administration, Azienda Unità Sanitaria Locale della Romagna, Ravenna, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-1809-184X
Giovanni GabuttiDepartment of Medical Sciences, Università di Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-7259-4923
Maria Teresa MontellaHealthcare Administration, IRCCS-Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori "Dino Amadori"- Irst, Meldola, Italy.
Istituto Scientifico Romagnolo per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori · ITAzienda Unità Sanitaria Locale Della Romagna · ITUniversity of Ferrara · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A retrospective study was conducted among Italian cancer healthcare workers (HCWs) to describe how influenza vaccination attitudes have changed during the COVID-19 pandemic. The analysis was conducted on the last three influenza seasons (2018/19, 2019/20 and 2020/21). To account for different relationships and proximity with patients, the study population was grouped into three main professional categories: health personnel, administrative staff and technicians. Moreover, to explore the factors affecting the coverage of influenza vaccine, a multinomial regression analysis was performed.Over the years, the influenza vaccination uptake showed a gradual increase across the overall staff, the highest coverage (53.8%) was observed in the season 2020/21, in particular, for health personnel (57.7%). In general, males resulted in more adherent to vaccination campaigns; nevertheless, this gap decreased in the last season. A total of 28.6% workers were always vaccinated throughout the past three seasons, a remarkable 25.2% (mainly young and females) received for the first time the influenza vaccination in 2020/21.In this dramatic health crisis, the attitudes of HCWs toward flu vaccination have changed. The COVID-19 outbreak increased adherence to flu vaccination, reaching the highest coverage in the campaign 2020/21. However, further efforts should be made to achieve greater vaccination coverage.

Indexed as

COVID-19Influenza, HumanInfluenza VaccinesNeoplasmsAttitudeAttitude of Health PersonnelFemaleHealth PersonnelHumansMalePandemicsRetrospective StudiesSARS-CoV-2SeasonsSurveys and QuestionnairesVaccinationInfluenza VaccinesCOVID-19healthcare workersInfluenza vaccinationinfluenza vaccination uptake

Identifiers

PMID34613881
PMCPMC8903766
OpenAlexW3202102977

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.