Design of the Recombinant Influenza Neuraminidase Antigen Is Crucial for Its Biochemical Properties and Protective Efficacy.

Supplementing influenza vaccines with recombinant neuraminidase (rNA) antigens remains a promising approach for improving suboptimal vaccine efficacy. However, correlations among rNA designs, properties, and protection have not been systematically investigated. Here, we performed a comparative analysis of several rNAs produced by the baculovirus/insect cell system. The rNAs were designed with different tetramerization motifs and NA domains from a recent H1N1 vaccine strain (A/Brisbane/02/2018) and compared for enzymatic properties, antigenicity, stability, and protection in mice. We found that the enzymatic properties differ between rNAs containing the NA head domain versus the full ectodomain, the formation of higher-order rNA oligomers is tetramerization domain dependent, whereas the protective efficacy is more contingent on the combination of the tetramerization and NA domains. Following single-dose immunizations, an rNA possessing the full ectodomain and the tetramerization motif from the human vasodilator-stimulated phosphoprotein provided much better protection than an rNA with ∼10-fold more enzymatically active molecules that is comprised of the head domain and the same tetramerization motif. In contrast, these two rNA designs provided comparable protection when the tetramerization motif from the tetrabrachion protein was used instead. These findings demonstrate that individual rNAs should be thoroughly evaluated for vaccine development, as the heterologous domain combination can result in rNAs with similar key attributes that vastly differ in protection.