Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34613578›Full record

Trial reportJournal of assisted reproduction and genetics2021

Autologous platelet-rich plasma treatment for moderate-severe Asherman syndrome: the first experience.

Lusine Aghajanova, Viji Sundaram, Chia-Ning Kao, Joseph M Letourneau, Evelyna Manvelyan, Marcelle I Cedars, Heather G Huddleston

Open access · greenAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Platelet Rich Plasma in Gynecology-Discovering Undiscovered-Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Review
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Lusine AghajanovaDivision of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA. aghajano@stanford.edu.
Viji SundaramDivision of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Chia-Ning KaoDivision of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Joseph M LetourneauDivision of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Evelyna ManvelyanDivision of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Marcelle I CedarsDivision of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Heather G HuddlestonDivision of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
University of California, San Francisco · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTreatment of Asherman syndrome (AS) presents a significant clinical challenge. Based on our in vitro data showing that PRP could activate endometrial cell proliferation and migration, we hypothesized that intrauterine infusion of autologous platelet-rich plasma (PRP) may improve endometrial regeneration and fertility outcomes in patients with moderate-severe AS. MATERIALS AND

methodsSubjects with moderate-severe AS were randomized to PRP or saline control administered following hysteroscopic adhesiolysis. Due to relative inability to randomize patients to the control group, after initial randomization of 10 subjects (6 in PRP and 4 in control groups), the remainder were prospectively enrolled in PRP group (n = 9), with 11 historic controls added to control group, for a total of 30 subjects (PRP n = 15; saline control n = 15). Right after hysteroscopy, 0.5-1 mL of PRP or saline was infused into the uterus via a Wallace catheter, followed by estrogen therapy. The primary outcomes were changes in endometrial thickness (EMT, checked in 3 weeks) and in menstrual flow; secondary outcomes were pregnancy and live birth rates. EMT and menstrual bleeding pattern were assessed before and after the intervention. Pregnancy was assessed over a 6-month period.

resultsThere were no statistically significant differences in age, gravidity/parity, cause of AS, preoperative menses assessment, AS hysteroscopy score, and intrauterine balloon placement between the groups. There was no statistically significant difference (p = 0.79) in EMT pre-PRP infusion for control (5.7 mm, 4.0-6.0) and study arm (5.3 mm, 4.9-6.0). There was no statistically significant change (p = 0.78) in EMT after PRP infusion (1.4 mm, - 0.5-2.4) vs saline (1.0 mm, 0.0-2.5). Patients tolerated the procedure well, with no adverse effects. There was no difference in the predicted likelihood of pregnancy (p = 0.45) between the control (0.67, 0.41-0.85) and study arm (0.53, 0.29-0.76).

conclusionsPRP was well accepted and tolerated in AS patients. However, we did not observe any significant EMT increase or improved pregnancy rates after adding PRP infusion, compared to standard treatment only. The use of intrauterine PRP infusion may be a feasible option, and its potential use must be tested on a larger sample size of AS patients.

Indexed as

Embryo ImplantationEmbryo TransferSeverity of Illness IndexAdultBirth RateCaliforniaCase-Control StudiesFemaleFertilization in VitroFollow-Up StudiesGynatresiaHumansHysteroscopyLive BirthMenstruationPilot ProjectsAsherman SyndromeEndometriumPlatelet-rich plasmaPregnancyPRP

Identifiers

PMID34613578
PMCPMC8609080
OpenAlexW3203843865

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.