Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34613568›Full record

ArticleIndian journal of gastroenterology : official journal of the Indian Society of Gastroenterology2021

Button battery ingestion in children: Experience from a tertiary center on 56 patients.

Syed Shafiq, Harshad Devarbhavi, Gurappa Balaji, Mallikarjuna Patil

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Indian journal of gastroenterology : official journal of the Indian Society of Gastroenterology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Editorial commentary on Indian Journal of Gastroenterology-September-October 2021.Indian journal of gastroenterology : official journal of the Indian Society of Gastroenterology · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Syed ShafiqDepartment of Medical Gastroenterology, St. John's Medical College Hospital, Sarjapur Road, Bengaluru, 560 034, India. syed.dr.s@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2647-1367
Harshad DevarbhaviDepartment of Medical Gastroenterology, St. John's Medical College Hospital, Sarjapur Road, Bengaluru, 560 034, India.
Gurappa BalajiDepartment of Gastroenterology, Fortis Hospital, 154, 9, Bannerghatta Main Road, Sahyadri Layout, Bilekahalli, Bengaluru, 560 076, India.
Mallikarjuna PatilDepartment of Medical Gastroenterology, St. John's Medical College Hospital, Sarjapur Road, Bengaluru, 560 034, India.
St.John's Medical College Hospital · INFortis Hospital · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND/

aimThe ubiquitous use of portable electronic devices has resulted in an increased incidence of button battery (BB) ingestion in children. BB ingestion represents a distinct category of ingested foreign body due to the associated high morbidity and mortality. The aim of this study was to report our experience in the management of BB ingestion in children.

methodsWe reviewed the clinical and endoscopic characteristics of 56 children (≤ 18 years) who presented to our hospital emergency department (ED) with BB ingestion between December 2016 and November 2019. Data with respect to patient demographics, time of presentation to ED to endoscopic retrieval of BB, the endoscopic findings, and complications, if any, were collected.

resultsWe encountered a total of 56 children with BB ingestions. While 10 BBs passed off spontaneously without any complication, 27 BBs were extracted endoscopically from the stomach. A total of 19 BB impactions occurred: 9 at the cricopharynx/upper esophageal sphincter (UES), 5 in the mid esophagus, 4 in the lower esophagus, and one at the pyloric ring. All impactions occurred with larger BBs (diameter ≥ 10 mm). Complications occurred in 3 children (5.35%) following retrieval; 2 developed upper esophageal strictures on follow-up, which were treated with serial dilations and one experienced esophageal perforation and peritonitis requiring laparotomy. There was no mortality in our study.

conclusionsA vast majority of ingested BBs pass off spontaneously or require minimal endoscopic intervention. Serious complications arise in a small minority especially in BBs > 10 mm in size with a potential for esophageal impaction.

Indexed as

Electric Power SuppliesForeign BodiesChildEatingEsophagusHumansInfantRetrospective StudiesButton batteryComplicationsDilatationLaparotomyMorbidityMortalityPerforationPeritonitisStricture

Identifiers

PMID34613568
OpenAlexW3204128580

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.