Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34613543›Full record

ArticleJournal of youth and adolescence2021

Perceptions of Legal Authorities in a Longitudinal Study of Adjudicated Youth.

Natasha Pusch, Kristy Holtfreter, Nicole McKenna, Adam D Fine

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of youth and adolescence, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Natasha PuschDepartment of Sociology, Anthropology, and Social Work, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, USA. npusch@ttu.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0117-4806
Kristy HoltfreterSchool of Criminology and Criminal Justice, Arizona State University, Phoenix, USA.
Nicole McKennaSchool of Criminal Justice, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, USA.
Adam D FineSchool of Criminology and Criminal Justice, Arizona State University, Phoenix, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

While perceptions of the legitimacy of formal authority have been found to influence offending, little is known about the extent to which such perceptions influence the related outcome of victimization. This study addressed this gap by examining how changes in legitimacy affected victimization both within- and between-individuals. This study used 7 waves of the Pathways to Desistance data (n = 1310; 13.85% female; age range 14-22). Youth who have committed serious offenses were surveyed at 6-month intervals during the transition from adolescence to young adulthood. In the full sample, the effects of legitimacy on both victimization and offending remained largely stable over time within individuals. Sensitivity analyses revealed that more positive perceptions of legitimacy significantly reduce offending for boys and reduce victimization for girls during the developmental period under study. Consistent with prior research, between-individual differences appear to be more important than within-individual change for explaining both offending and victimization. The implications of the results for theory, future research, and early intervention for high-risk youth are discussed.

Indexed as

Adolescent BehaviorBullyingCrime VictimsAdolescentAdultFemaleHumansLongitudinal StudiesMalePerceptionYoung AdultJuvenile offendersLegitimacyLife course criminologyVictimization

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.