ArticleNeurosurgical review2022
Does interventional MRI-guided brain cryotherapy cause a blood-brain barrier disruption? Radiological analysis and perspectives.
Article in Neurosurgical review, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Synergistic Effects of Cryotherapy and Radiotherapy in Glioblastoma Treatment: Evidence from a Murine Model.Cancers · 2025Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Glioblastoma is the most common primary malignant brain tumor with an incidence of 5/100,000 inhabitants/year and a 5-year survival rate of 6.8%. Despite recent advances in the molecular biology understanding of glioblastoma, CNS chemotherapy remains challenging because of the impermeable blood-brain barrier (BBB). Interventional MRI-guided brain cryotherapy (IMRgC) is technique that creates a tissue lesion by making a severe targeted hypothermia and possibly a BBB disruption. This study goal was to analyze the effect of IMRgC on human BBB glioblastoma through its gadolinium enhancing features. All patients harboring a local glioblastoma recurrence and meeting all the inclusion criteria were consecutively included into this retrospective study during a 2-year period. The primary endpoint was to analyze the modification of the gadolinium enhancement on MRI T1 sequences using MR perfusion weighted images during follow-up. The secondary endpoint was to assess any ischemic/hemorrhagic complication following cryotherapy procedure using diffusion weighted imaging (DWI), susceptibility weighted imaging (SWI), or fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR). Among the 6 patients studied, all (100%) showed a BBB disruption on the cryotherapy site through the analysis of the perfusion weighted images with an average delay of 2.83 months following the procedure. The gadolinium enhancement located around the cavity then spontaneously decreased in 4/6 patients (67%). No ischemic or hemorrhagic complication was recorded. This study confirms the IMRgC capacity to disrupt BBB as already suggested by the literature. IMRgC might represent a new option in the management of GBM allowing the combined effect of direct cryoablation and enhanced chemotherapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.