ArticleEuropean journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie2022
Comparison of the efficacy of corticosteroid, dry needling, and PRP application in lateral epicondylitis.
Article in European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Corticosteroid injection or dry needling for musculoskeletal pain and disability? A systematic review and GRADE evidence synthesis.Chiropractic & manual therapies · 2021Pooled it
- Effectiveness of non-invasive therapies on pain, maximum grip strength, disability, and quality of life for lateral elbow tendinopathy: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Brazilian journal of physical therapyPooled it
- Percutaneous tendon dry needling and thrust manipulation as an adjunct to multimodal physical therapy in patients with lateral elbow tendinopathy: A multicenter randomized clinical trial.Clinical rehabilitation · 2024Trial
- Comparison of ultrasound-guided dry needling and platelet-rich plasma injection in the management of refractory lateral epicondyle tendinopathy.Clinics in shoulder and elbow · 2026Article
- Time-Dependent Efficacy and Safety of Percutaneous Treatments for Lateral Epicondylitis: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.Journal of pain research · 2026Review
- Musculoskeletal Ultrasound-Guided Micro-Needle-Knife Intervention at the Deep Fascial versus Superficial Fascial Layers in Lateral Epicondylitis Patients: A Randomized Controlled Trial.Journal of pain research · 2026Article
- Platelet rich plasma versus corticosteroids for lateral epicondylitis: a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.Clinics in shoulder and elbow · 2025Article
- Industry affiliation influence on randomized controlled trials for platelet-rich plasma in the treatment of lateral epicondylitis: a systematic review.JSES international · 2024Article
- Upper Body Injuries in Golfers.Current reviews in musculoskeletal medicine · 2022Review
- Local Corticosteroid Injection Versus Dry Needling in the Treatment of Lateral Epicondylitis.Cureus · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe aim of this study was to compare the short-term efficacy of dry needling, corticosteroids, and platelet-rich plasma application (PRP) in the management of lateral epicondylitis.
methodsThe study included 72 patients diagnosed with lateral epicondylitis divided into three groups of 24 individuals using the sealed envelope method. Group 1 underwent dry needling, Group 2 received 40 mg methylprednisolone acetate, and Group 3 received PRP treatment. Patients were assessed using the visual analog scale (VAS) and the Disabilities of the Shoulder, Arm, and Hand (DASH) score, and Jamar grip strength before treatment and 3rd week and 3rd month.
resultsAt the 3rd month, the mean VAS score was 1.16 ± 0.56 in dry needling group and 0.75 ± 0.60 in corticosteroids group, showing a statistically significant difference between dry needling and corticosteroids group, and between corticosteroids and PRP group (p = 0.015 and p = 0.000, respectively). At the 3rd week and 3rd month, VAS scores decreased in each treatment modality group, showing a statistically significant difference between the groups (p < 0.01). Jamar grip strength increased over time in all groups. There were no significant differences between the DASH scores of all groups at the 3rd week (p > 0.05). DASH scores decreased significantly from the 3rd week to the 3rd month in dry needling and corticosteroids group (p < 0.01), while it increased slightly in PRP group during the same period with a statistically insignificant change (p > 0.05). DASH scores decreased significantly at the 3rd month for all groups (p = 0.014).
conclusionDry needling is an effective and safe application for the short-term treatment of lateral epicondylitis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.