ArticleWorld journal of urology2022
The value of procalcitonin for predicting urosepsis after mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy or flexible ureteroscopy based on different organisms.
Article in World journal of urology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Safety and efficacy of a flexible and navigable suction ureteral access sheath vs. a conventional intelligent pressure-control sheath in retrograde intrarenal surgery for infection-related renal calculi.International urology and nephrology · 2026Trial
- Foley catheter after ureteroscopy and JJ stent placement: a randomised prospective European Association of Urology Section of Urolithiasis-Young Academic Urologists (EULIS-YAU) endourology study.BJU international · 2025Trial
- Urine culture, stone culture, and procalcitonin: a triad for predicting the risk of infectious complications after mini-PCNL-results from a large, single-center series.World journal of urology · 2025Article
- Predictive value of procalcitonin for the therapeutic response of patients with uroseptic shock: a retrospective case-control study.American journal of translational research · 2025Article
- Predicting and Avoiding Complications in Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy in the Era of Personalized Medicine: A Scoping Review.Journal of personalized medicine · 2024Article
- Dynamics of Urinary Extracellular DNA in Urosepsis.Biomolecules · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
13 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
purposeTo assess the value of procalcitonin (PCT) as an early biomarker for predicting urosepsis caused by Gram-negative (GN) bacteria, Gram-positive (GP) bacteria and fungi following mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy (mPCNL) and flexible ureteroscopy (FURS).
methodsA total number of 356 patients with positive preoperative UC (urine cultures) who underwent mPCNL and FURS between June 2017 and January 2021 were retrospectively analyzed. Univariable analysis and multivariable logistic regression analysis were conducted to compare the predictors for urosepsis caused by different organisms. Furthermore, the nomogram was established as a predicted model for urosepsis.
resultsAmong 356 positive UC, 265 (74.4%) were positive for GN bacteria, 77 (21.4%) for GP bacteria and 14 (3.9%) for fungal pathogens. Escherichia coli (48.9%) were the predominant pathogens and Enterococcus (54/77) were the most common GP bacteria. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that positive nitrite (OR 3.31, 95% CI 1.20-9.14; P = 0.021), operative time > 90 min (OR 3.10, 95% CI 1.10-8.75, P = 0.033) and postoperative PCT > 0.1 ng/mL (OR 56.18, 95% CI 15.20-207.64, P < 0.001) were associated with postoperative urosepsis originated in GN infections, while urosepsis caused by GP bacteria and fungi was not associated with PCT > 0.1 ng/mL (P = 0.198), only stone burden > 800 mm
conclusionsFor patients with positive preoperative UC, postoperative PCT > 0.1 ng/mL was an independent risk factor of post-PCNL and post-FURS urosepsis caused by GN bacteria rather than GP bacteria and fungi.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.