Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34613388›Full record

ReviewJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA2022

The messiness of the menstruator: assessing personas and functionalities of menstrual tracking apps.

Adrienne Pichon, Kasey B Jackman, Inga T Winkler, Chris Bobel, Noémie Elhadad

Erratum issuedOpen access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 53 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Informing the Design of Individualized Self-Management Regimens from the Human, Data, and Machine Learning Perspectives.ACM transactions on computer-human interaction : a publication of the Association for Computing Machinery · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Observational
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Determinants and Assessment of Menstrual Blood Flow.Current epidemiology reports · 2023
    Article
  14. Menstruation in the USA.Current epidemiology reports · 2023
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Adrienne PichonBiomedical Informatics, Columbia University, New York, New York, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9393-3410
Kasey B JackmanSchool of Nursing, Columbia University, New York, New York, USA.
Inga T WinklerInstitute for the Study of Human Rights, Columbia University, New York, New York, USA.
Chris BobelWomen's, Gender, and Sexuality Studies, University of Massachusetts, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Noémie ElhadadBiomedical Informatics, Columbia University, New York, New York, USA.
Columbia University · USCentral European University · ATNewYork–Presbyterian Hospital · USUniversity of Massachusetts Boston · US

Funding

Training in Biomedical Informatics at Columbia UniversityT15LM007079 · NLM · COLUMBIA UNIV NEW YORK MORNINGSIDE · PI NOEMIE ELHADAD, GEORGE M HRIPCSAK · 1992 to 2026
$28.9M
Reducing Health Disparities Through Informatics - Genomics SupplementT32NR007969 · NINR · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI SUZANNE BAKKEN, Rebecca Schnall · 2002 to 2026
$7.9M
Reaching Communities through the Design of Information Visualizations (ReDIVis) Toolbox to Address COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy and Uptake.P30NR016587 · NINR · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI BAKKEN, SUZANNE, SMALDONE, ARLENE M · 2016 to 2022
$4.3M
PhendoPHL:A Data-Science Enabled Personal Health Library to Manage EndometriosisR01LM013043 · NLM · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI ELHADAD, NOEMIE · 2019 to 2022
$1.4M
NINR NIH HHS P30 NR016587NINR NIH HHS T32 NR007969NINR NIH HHS T32NR007969NLM NIH HHS R01 LM013043NLM NIH HHS # T15 LM007079NLM NIH HHS T15 LM007079
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe aim of this study was to examine trends in the intended users and functionalities advertised by menstrual tracking apps to identify gaps in personas and intended needs fulfilled by these technologies. MATERIALS AND

methodsTwo types of materials were collected: a corpus of scientific articles related to the identities and needs of menstruators and a corpus of images and descriptions of menstrual tracking apps collected from the Google and Apple app stores. We conducted a scoping review of the literature to develop themes and then applied these as a framework to analyze the app corpus, looking for alignments and misalignments between the 2 corpora.

resultsA review of the literature showed a wide range of disciplines publishing work relevant to menstruators. We identified 2 broad themes: "who are menstruators?" and "what are the needs of menstruators?" Descriptions of menstrual trackers exhibited misalignments with these themes, with narrow characterizations of menstruators and design for limited needs. DISCUSSION: We synthesize gaps in the design of menstrual tracking apps and discuss implications for designing around: (1) an irregular menstrual cycle as the norm; (2) the embodied, leaky experience of menstruation; and (3) the varied biologies, identities, and goals of menstruators. An overarching gap suggests a need for a human-centered artificial intelligence approach for model and data provenance, transparency and explanations of uncertainties, and the prioritization of privacy in menstrual trackers.

conclusionComparing and contrasting literature about menstruators and descriptions of menstrual tracking apps provide a valuable guide to assess menstrual technology and their responsiveness to users and their needs.

Indexed as

Mobile ApplicationsArtificial IntelligenceDelivery of Health CareFemaleHumansMenstruationPrivacymenstrual trackingmenstruationmobile healthpersonal health informatics

Identifiers

PMID34613388
PMCPMC8757321
OpenAlexW3203653999

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.