Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34612714›Full record

ArticleJournal of computational biology : a journal of computational molecular cell biology2021

Joint Clustering of Single-Cell Sequencing and Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization Data for Reconstructing Clonal Heterogeneity in Cancers.

Xuecong Fu, Haoyun Lei, Yifeng Tao, Kerstin Heselmeyer-Haddad, Irianna Torres, Michael Dean, Thomas Ried, Russell Schwartz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of computational biology : a journal of computational molecular cell biology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Prognostic Impact ofCancers · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Xuecong FuDepartment of Biological Sciences, and Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
Haoyun LeiComputational Biology Department, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
Yifeng TaoComputational Biology Department, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5076-0081
Kerstin Heselmeyer-HaddadGenetics Branch, Cancer Genomics Section, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
Irianna TorresGenetics Branch, Cancer Genomics Section, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
Michael DeanLaboratory of Translational Genomics, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Rockville, Maryland, USA.
Thomas RiedGenetics Branch, Cancer Genomics Section, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
Russell SchwartzDepartment of Biological Sciences, and Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4970-2252

Funding

Reconstructing mechanisms of somatic variation in diverse cellular lineagesR01HG010589 · NHGRI · CARNEGIE-MELLON UNIVERSITY · PI SCHWARTZ, RUSSELL S · 2020 to 2023
$1.4M
DECONVOLUTION OF CLONAL HETEROGENEITY FROM BULK AND SINGLE-CELL VARIATION DATAR21CA216452 · NCI · CARNEGIE-MELLON UNIVERSITY · PI SCHWARTZ, RUSSELL S · 2017 to 2018
$342k
NCI NIH HHS R21 CA216452NHGRI NIH HHS R01 HG010589
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aneuploidy and whole genome duplication (WGD) events are common features of cancers associated with poor outcomes, but the ways they influence trajectories of clonal evolution are poorly understood. Phylogenetic methods for reconstructing clonal evolution from genomic data have proven a powerful tool for understanding how clonal evolution occurs in the process of cancer progression, but extant methods so far have limited the ability to resolve tumor evolution via ploidy changes. This limitation exists in part because single-cell DNA-sequencing (scSeq), which has been crucial to developing detailed profiles of clonal evolution, has difficulty in resolving ploidy changes and WGD. Multiplex interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization (miFISH) provides a more unambiguous signal of single-cell ploidy changes but it is limited to profiling small numbers of single markers. Here, we develop a joint clustering method to combine these two data sources with the goal of better resolving ploidy changes in tumor evolution. We develop a probabilistic framework to maximize the probability of latent variables given the pre-clustered datasets, which we optimize via Markov chain Monte Carlo sampling combined with linear regression. We validate the method by using simulated data derived from a glioblastoma (GBM) case profiled by both scSeq and miFISH. We further apply the method to two GBM cases with scSeq and miFISH data by reconstructing a phylogenetic tree from the joint clustering results, demonstrating their synergistic value in understanding how focal copy number changes and WGD events can collectively contribute to tumor progression.

Indexed as

AnaphaseAneuploidyBrain NeoplasmsClonal EvolutionCluster AnalysisComputational BiologyEvolution, MolecularGlioblastomaHumansIn Situ Hybridization, FluorescenceMarkov ChainsMonte Carlo MethodPhylogenySequence Analysis, RNASingle-Cell Analysiscancerclonal evolutionsequencingsingle-cell genomics

Identifiers

PMID34612714
PMCPMC8819512

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.