ArticleCancer medicine2021
Possibility of brigatinib-based therapy, or chemotherapy plus anti-angiogenic treatment after resistance of osimertinib harboring EGFR T790M-cis-C797S mutations in lung adenocarcinoma patients.
Article in Cancer medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- Combination of Osimertinib and Brigatinib in the Treatment of EGFR Triple-Mutated Lung Adenocarcinoma: A Case Report.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2025Article
- Strategies Beyond 3rd EGFR-TKI Acquired Resistance: Opportunities and Challenges.Cancer medicine · 2025Review
- Review
- A macrocyclic kinase inhibitor overcomes triple resistant mutations in EGFR-positive lung cancer.NPJ precision oncology · 2024Article
- Case report: Sustained remission after combined sintilimab, anti-VEGF therapy, and chemotherapy in a patient with non-small cell lung cancer harboring acquiredFrontiers in oncology · 2024Article
- The Resistance to EGFR-TKIs in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: From Molecular Mechanisms to Clinical Application of New Therapeutic Strategies.Pharmaceutics · 2023Review
- Making the Best Use of Available Weapons for the Inevitable Rivalry-Resistance to EGFR-TKIs.Biomedicines · 2023Review
- Therapeutic strategies for EGFR-mutated non-small cell lung cancer patients with osimertinib resistance.Journal of hematology & oncology · 2022Review
- Drug resistance mechanisms and progress in the treatment of EGFR-mutated lung adenocarcinoma.Oncology letters · 2022Review
- Monitoring Somatic Genetic Alterations in Circulating Cell-Free DNA/RNA of Patients with "Oncogene-Addicted" Advanced Lung Adenocarcinoma: A Real-World Clinical Study.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Article
- Possibility of brigatinib-based therapy, or chemotherapy plus anti-angiogenic treatment after resistance of osimertinib harboring EGFR T790M-cis-C797S mutations in lung adenocarcinoma patients.Cancer medicine · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThere was no standard treatment for patients who acquired resistance to osimertinib mediated by epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) T790M-cis-C797S. The aim of this study was to investigate the association between different therapeutic strategies and survival outcomes among these patients.
methodsThis retrospective cohort study analyzed 46 patients with metastatic lung adenocarcinoma and EGFR T790M-cis-C797S after osimertinib progression from January 1, 2017 to October 31, 2020. Among them, 13 patients received brigatinib-based therapy, 23 patients received chemotherapy in combination of anti-angiogenics or not, and 10 patients received other targeted treatments like dacomtinib, bevacizumab, or a combined therapy of osimertinib and other targeted drugs.
resultsCompared to other targeted therapy, brigatinib-based therapy (median progression-free survival [mPFS]: 4.40 vs. 1.63 months, hazard ratio [HR] = 0.39, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.21-0.73, p = 0.001) and chemotherapy-based treatment (mPFS: 4.70 vs. 1.63 months, HR = 0.18, 95% CI: 0.06-0.50, p < 0.001) presented a better survival outcome and there was no significant difference between brigatinib-based therapy and chemotherapy-based treatment (mPFS: 4.40 vs. 4.70 months, HR = 1.24, 95% CI: 0.57-2.67, p = 0.58). Chemotherapy combined with anti-angiogenics achieved a better efficacy than only chemotherapy (mPFS: 5.50 vs. 1.03 months, HR = 0.30, 95% CI: 0.11-0.83, p = 0.02). Patients carrying EGFR exon 19 deletion mutation had a longer PFS than those who harboring EGFR exon 21 p.L858R mutation (4.57 vs. 1.03 months, HR = 0.18, 95% CI: 0.06-0.54, p = 0.001), no matter they received brigatinib-based therapy (mPFS: 5.00 vs. 3.23 months, HR = 0.19, 95% CI: 0.01-0.96, p = 0.05) or chemotherapy-based treatment (mPFS: 7.23 vs. 1.03 months, HR = 0.05, 95% CI 0.01-0.49, p < 0.001).
conclusionBrigatinib-based therapy and chemotherapy plus anti-angiogenics could be considered beyond progression from osimertinib therapy. For patients harboring EGFR exon 19 deletion/T790M/cis-C797S mutation, the clinical efficacy was superior to patients harboring EGFR exon 21 p.L858R/T790M/cis-C797S mutation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.