Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34612049›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Heart Association2021

Clinical Characteristics, Management Strategies, and Outcomes of Non-ST-Segment-Elevation Myocardial Infarction Patients With and Without Prior Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting.

Ahmad Shoaib, Muhammad Rashid, Colin Berry, Nick Curzen, Evangelos Kontopantelis, Adam Timmis, Ayesha Ahmad, Tim Kinnaird, Mamas A Mamas

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Heart Association, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Observational
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Ahmad ShoaibKeele Cardiovascular Research Group Centre for Prognosis Research Institute for Primary Care and Health Sciences Keele University Stoke-on-Trent UK.ORCID 0000-0003-0513-8319
Muhammad RashidKeele Cardiovascular Research Group Centre for Prognosis Research Institute for Primary Care and Health Sciences Keele University Stoke-on-Trent UK.
Colin BerryInstitute of Cardiovascular & Medical Sciences University of Glasgow UK.ORCID 0000-0002-4547-8636
Nick CurzenCardiothoracic Department University Hospital Southampton & Faculty of MedicineUniversity of Southampton UK.
Evangelos KontopantelisDivision of Informatics, Imaging and Data Sciences University of Manchester UK.ORCID 0000-0001-6450-5815
Adam TimmisBarts & the London School of Medicine and Dentistry Queen Mary University London London UK.
Ayesha AhmadKeele Cardiovascular Research Group Centre for Prognosis Research Institute for Primary Care and Health Sciences Keele University Stoke-on-Trent UK.
Tim KinnairdUniversity Hospital of Wales Cardiff UK.ORCID 0000-0003-1209-3534
Mamas A MamasKeele Cardiovascular Research Group Centre for Prognosis Research Institute for Primary Care and Health Sciences Keele University Stoke-on-Trent UK.ORCID 0000-0001-9241-8890

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/N003403/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background There are limited data on the management strategies, temporal trends and clinical outcomes of patients who present with non-ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction and have a prior history of CABG. Methods and Results We identified 287 658 patients with non-ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction between 2010 and 2017 in the United Kingdom Myocardial Infarction National Audit Project database. Clinical and outcome data were analyzed by dividing into 2 groups by prior history of coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG): group 1, no prior CABG (n=262 362); and group 2, prior CABG (n=25 296). Patients in group 2 were older, had higher GRACE (Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events) risk scores and burden of comorbid illnesses. More patients underwent coronary angiography (69% versus 63%) and revascularization (53% versus 40%) in group 1 compared with group 2. Adjusted odds of receiving inpatient coronary angiogram (odds ratio [OR], 0.91; 95% CI, 0.88-0.95;

Indexed as

Myocardial InfarctionNon-ST Elevated Myocardial InfarctionPercutaneous Coronary InterventionCoronary Artery BypassHemorrhageHumansRisk FactorsTreatment Outcomecoronary artery bypass graftingmortalitynon–ST‐segment–elevation myocardial infarctionpercutaneous coronary intervention

Identifiers

PMID34612049
PMCPMC8751868

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.