Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34611774›Full record

ArticleTropical animal health and production2021

South Indian zebu dwarf cattle show higher natural resistance to tick infestation compared to crossbreds: preliminary observations.

K S Akhil, M Chackochan, C Sunanda, P M Rojan, S N Nair, S Simon, D Sanjay, C N Dinesh, R Ravindran

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Tropical animal health and production, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

K S AkhilCollege of Veterinary and Animal Sciences (Kerala Veterinary and Animal Sciences University), Kerala, Pookode, 673576, India.
M ChackochanCollege of Veterinary and Animal Sciences (Kerala Veterinary and Animal Sciences University), Kerala, Pookode, 673576, India.
C SunandaCollege of Veterinary and Animal Sciences (Kerala Veterinary and Animal Sciences University), Kerala, Pookode, 673576, India.
P M RojanCollege of Veterinary and Animal Sciences (Kerala Veterinary and Animal Sciences University), Kerala, Pookode, 673576, India.
S N NairCollege of Veterinary and Animal Sciences (Kerala Veterinary and Animal Sciences University), Kerala, Mannuthy, 680651, India.
S SimonCollege of Veterinary and Animal Sciences (Kerala Veterinary and Animal Sciences University), Kerala, Mannuthy, 680651, India.
D SanjayKerala State Department of Animal Husbandry, Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala, India.
C N DineshCollege of Veterinary and Animal Sciences (Kerala Veterinary and Animal Sciences University), Kerala, Pookode, 673576, India.
R RavindranCollege of Veterinary and Animal Sciences (Kerala Veterinary and Animal Sciences University), Kerala, Pookode, 673576, India. reghu@kvasu.ac.in.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9250-0552
Kerala Veterinary and Animal Sciences University · INGovernment of Kerala · IN

Funding

Kerala Veterinary and Animal Sciences University, Pookode NIL
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The present study aimed to evaluate the influence of various factors on the host resistance of cattle against tick infestation in Kerala State, South India. The number of naturally infested semi-engorged female ticks present on the cattle was counted on a sample cattle population across the four regions of Kerala. Then, the animals were grouped based on the tick count. The chi-square test and Fisher exact test were used to identify the effects of genetic and non-genetic factors on tick burden in cattle. It was found that the Holstein Friesian crossbred and Jersey crossbred cattle had a significantly higher level of tick infestation than the indigenous Vechur breed (Bos indicus). No tick infestation was observed in indigenous Kasaragod Dwarf cattle (B. indicus). Tick infestation was more in heifers and dry animals than lactating animals. However, the sex of the animal and the stage of lactation did not influence the tick load. Tick infestation was also influenced by parity, grazing, and region.

Indexed as

Cattle DiseasesTick InfestationsTicksAnimalsCattleFemaleImmunity, InnateLactationGenetic and non-genetic factorsHost resistanceIndigenous cattleKasaragod DwarfKeralaVechur

Identifiers

PMID34611774
OpenAlexW3202522824

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.